Catalog Number 80219 |
Device Problems
Failure to Advance (2524); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/18/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 12/2025) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the popliteal artery, when the tube was sent to the superficial femoral artery, it could no longer be pushed forward.It was further reported that upon withdrawal of the catheter, the tip was allegedly found to be deformed.The procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the popliteal artery, when the tube was sent to the superficial femoral artery, it could no longer be pushed forward.It was further reported that upon withdrawal of the catheter, the tip was allegedly found to be deformed.The procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the catheter was returned for evaluation and hence, a physical investigation was performed for the catheter.During physical investigation, the tube and helix inside of the rotarex was kinked at one centimeter from the tip of the catheter.The test guidewire did not pass through the catheter.It was not possible to achieve any rotations.The catheter was opened, and a lot of bodily material found inside around the helix.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported kink of the rotarex catheter.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 12/2025), g3, h6 (device).H11: d3, e1, g1, h6 (method, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|