It was reported that in 2020, a 21mm trifecta gt valve was implanted during an aortic valve replacement.In (b)(6) 2023, the patient presented to the hospital with structural valve deterioration (svd) and evidence of aortic valve regurgitation with at least one leaflet collapsed.On (b)(6) 2024, the patient was admitted to the hospital with a plan to undergo a redo aortic valve replacement.On (b)(6) 2024, the patient was taken to the operating room.Intra-operatively, the valve had fibrous-calcific deterioration with significant adhesions and tissue-in-growth between the trifecta gt valve and the aortic wall.Due to the adhesions and tissue-in-growth the trifecta gt valve had to be broken into multiple smaller pieces in order to remove it from the aortic wall.The surgical procedure was complex and took more than 6 hours and ultimately the patient could not be separated from cardiopulmonary bypass and died during surgery on (b)(6) 2024.
|
It was reported that the patient presented with structural valve deterioration (svd) and evidence of aortic valve regurgitation with at least one leaflet collapsed.The patient was taken to the operating room for aortic valve replacement.It was reported intra-operatively the valve had fibrous-calcific deterioration with significant adhesions and tissue-in-growth between the trifecta gt valve and the aortic wall.Due to the adhesions and tissue-in-growth the trifecta gt valve had to be broken into multiple smaller pieces in order to remove it from the aortic wall.Field indicated that the surgical procedure was complex and took more than six hours and ultimately the patient could not be separated from cardiopulmonary bypass and the patient expired during surgery.A more comprehensive assessment, including histopathological examination of the valve tissue could not be performed as the device was not returned for analysis.A variety of factors may contribute to svd, including patient, biological, and implant related factors: no implant related factors could be confirmed from the information received from the field as information related to implant procedure was not provided.Based on information received the valve had fibrous-calcific deterioration with significant adhesions and tissue-in-growth, which may have contributed to the reported svd, however could not be confirmed as the valve was not returned for histopathological examination.The cause of patient death could not be conclusively determined, however based on medical review the patient death could possibly be related to difficulty explanting the trifecta gt valve in the presence of adhesions to the aortic wall which most likely prolonged the implant procedure and required repair of the aorta.The date of procedure was estimated as (b)(6) 2020 as it was reported that the device was implanted on an unknown date in the year 2020.
|