On december 8, 2021, senseonics was made aware of a false hyperglycemia event due to alleged sensor inaccuracies on 06-december-2021 at 11:19 pm.The blood glucose (bg) value was 114 mg/dl where as sensor glucose (sg) value was 340 mg/dl.User received high glucose alerts even though bg was in normal range.The high alert threshold was set at 180 mg/dl.User had no symptoms at the time of incident and did not require any medical attention.User mentioned that he generally takes insulin whenever there is hyperglycemia.
|
This report is being submitted retrospectively as part of an internal review.Transmitter was the initial suspected device.However, it was not requested to be returned for evaluation as it was still being used by the user.The complaint of resulting from an inaccuracy was investigated and confirmed based on user's data in data management system (dms).A rate of change of the performance indicators revealed that the cause of the reported inaccuracy is noise in the signal 'on' channels, affecting the glucose modulation.Due to sensor performance issues, a return material authorization (rma) was issued for sensor to investigate the issue further.The sensor was tested in-house, and the review of qc did not reveal any malfunction of the sensor.In some instances, the failure mode (sensor performance) that presents itself in the body cannot be reproduced in the lab upon returned product analysis mainly as the test conditions do not replicate the exact conditions in-vivo at the time of failure, and the explant and subsequent decontamination of the product might also alter the state of the sensor.Based on historical data of similar incidents, the shift (i.E.Sudden decline) in sensor chemical performance that occurs within the initial weeks of sensor insertion could potentially be attributed to insufficient hydration of chemical component of the sensor, for which senseonics is continuing to investigate to learn more about the failure mode and resolution.
|