• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CAROTID WALLSTENT; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CAROTID WALLSTENT; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Model Number 26605
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/04/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that stent struts damage occurred.Vascular access was obtained via the left femoral artery and whole brain angiography revealed about 70% stenosis in the target lesion located in the extremely tortuous left internal carotid artery (ica).After placing a guide catheter, a 0.014 guidewire was advanced into the lesion followed by another catheter.The guidewire was removed, and a filter wire was advanced.Following pre-dilatation, an 8.0-29 carotid wallstent was advanced over the filter wire.However, after reaching the lesion, the sheath could not be withdrawn and the stent could not be deployed.After removal, it was noted that the stent struts had been deformed.The procedure was completed with a 9x40 carotid wallstent.There were no complications reported and the patient status was stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
E1 - initial reporter address 1: (b)(6).
 
Event Description
It was reported that stent struts damage occurred.Vascular access was obtained via the left femoral artery and whole brain angiography revealed about 70% stenosis in the target lesion located in the extremely tortuous left internal carotid artery (ica).After placing a guide catheter, a 0.014 guidewire was advanced into the lesion followed by another catheter.The guidewire was removed, and a filter wire was advanced.Following pre-dilatation, an 8.0-29 carotid wallstent was advanced over the filter wire.However, after reaching the lesion, the sheath could not be withdrawn and the stent could not be deployed.After removal, it was noted that the stent struts had been deformed.The procedure was completed with a 9x40 carotid wallstent.There were no complications reported and the patient status was stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
E1 - initial reporter address 1: (b)(6).Device evaluated by mfr: the complaint device was received for product analysis.A visual examination found the stent of the device to be fully deployed from the device.The deployed stent was not returned for analysis.A visual and tactile inspection identified no kinks or damage to the delivery system.A visual examination identified no issues with the tip of the device.This concludes the product analysis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAROTID WALLSTENT
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
rachel shields
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6512422111
MDR Report Key18758828
MDR Text Key336968323
Report Number2124215-2024-08114
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/16/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/22/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number26605
Device Catalogue Number26605
Device Lot Number0030183325
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/26/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/20/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age57 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight68 KG
-
-