• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. HARMONIC ACE 5MM SHEAR; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. HARMONIC ACE 5MM SHEAR; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number HARXX
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Fistula (1862); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 12/01/2021
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
Title: learning curve from 450 cases of robot-assisted pancreaticoduocectomy in a high-volume pancreatic center optimization of operative procedure and a retrospective study author(s): yusheng shi, md, weishen wang, md, weihua qiu, md, phd, shulin zhao, md, jian wang, md, yuanchi weng, md, zhen huo, md, jiabin jin, md,yue wang, md, xiaxing deng, md, phd, baiyong shen, md, phd, and chenghong peng, md, phd citation: ann surg 2021;274:e1277¿e1; doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003664 this study aimed to describe our experience and the learning curve of 450 cases of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and optimize the surgical process so that our findings can be useful for surgeons starting to perform robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy.Between may 2010 and december 2018, 450 patients who underwent robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy were included in the study.There were 249 males and 201 females with a mean age of 57.9 years and a mean bmi of 23.1 kg/m2.During the procedure, gastrectomy was performed using a non-ethicon surgical stapler (manufacturer: unknown).The uncinate process was separated upwardly by the harmonic scalpel (ethicon endo-surgery).Reconstruction of the pancreatic remnant: pancreaticojejunostomy was performed as end-to-side duct-to-mucosa reconstruction.3¿0 prolene suture (ethicon) was chosen for the outer layer.6¿0 or 5¿0 prolene suture (ethicon) was used for the inner layer according to the size of mpd.Reconstruction of cholangiojejunostomy was performed with 5-0 prolene suture (ethicon) or non- ethicon polydioxanone continuous sutures (manufacturer: unknown).For those having strong tension of cholangiojejunostomy, several sutures were added nearby to reduce the tension.Reconstruction of the gastrojejunostomy was usually performed using a competitors¿ suture (manufacturer: medtronic) inside the abdomen.Otherwise, the stomach and the jejunum were anchored together, then the gastrojejunostomy was performed outside the abdomen using a competitors¿ suture (manufacturer: medtronic) or a non-ethicon stapler (manufacturer: unknown).Reported complications included massive bleeding (n=3), biochemical/bile leak (n=39), postoperative pancreatic fistulas (n=44), postoperative abdominal bleeding (n=13), postoperative bleeding (n=10), unspecified severe complications/clavien-dindo class iii or higher (n=32), death due to abdominal bleeding caused by postoperative pancreatic fistulas and infection (n=4).In conclusion, robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and feasible for selected patients.Operative and oncologic outcomes were much improved after experience of 250 cases.Our optimization of the surgical process may have also contributed to this.Future prospective and randomized studies are needed to confirm our results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 2/23/2024 b3: publication year of 2021 d4: batch # unk this report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the manufacturing records cannot be reviewed as the lot/batch number has not been provided.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: does the author/surgeon believe that the ethicon harmonic device caused or contributed to the patient complications mentioned in the article? if yes, please explain does the author/surgeon believe that the ethicon harmonic device caused or contributed to the patient death mentioned in the article? if yes, please explain is the author/surgeon interested in speaking with ethicon medical and engineering? the author could not be contacted and the information could not be confirmed.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HARMONIC ACE 5MM SHEAR
Type of Device
INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
*  00969
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
*   00969
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
475 calle c
guaynabo 
*  
3035526892
MDR Report Key18767432
MDR Text Key336111715
Report Number3005075853-2024-01579
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LFL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K120729
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/23/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/23/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberHARXX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/30/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
-
-