• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION OPTICROSS 18; CATHETER, ULTRASOUND, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION OPTICROSS 18; CATHETER, ULTRASOUND, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number 44021
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 02/08/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the catheter issue occurred.The 100% stenosed target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified left common iliac artery.The opticross imaging catheter was advanced for ultrasound examination of the target lesion.During the procedure, treatment was performed via a contralateral approach.A 4fr sheath was retrogradely punctured from the inguinal region on the same side as the treatment site.A guidewire was manipulated to penetrate in a bidirectional manner.After pre-dilation inside the vessel, when the physician deployed the stent from the contralateral side without removing the device from the sheath outside the patient, the tip of the device got caught between the vessel wall and stent strut.The physician attempted to remove the device, but since it was stuck in the stent strut, it could not be easily extracted.As the physician pulled strongly, it became separated.Upon fluoroscopic examination, it could not be confirmed.Another observation was made using another device of the same type, and it was confirmed that the device had become caught between the stent and blood vessel, and the separated catheter tip was flowing in the blood vessel lumen.Since the separated part was small, the physician concluded that there would be no problem, and the procedure was completed as planned.No patient injury was reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the catheter issue occurred.The 100% stenosed target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified left common iliac artery.The opticross imaging catheter was advanced for ultrasound examination of the target lesion.During the procedure, treatment was performed via a contralateral approach.A 4fr sheath was retrogradely punctured from the inguinal region on the same side as the treatment site.A guidewire was manipulated to penetrate in a bidirectional manner.After pre-dilation inside the vessel, when the physician deployed the stent from the contralateral side without removing the device from the sheath outside the patient, the tip of the device got caught between the vessel wall and stent strut.The physician attempted to remove the device, but since it was stuck in the stent strut, it could not be easily extracted.As the physician pulled strongly, it became separated.Upon fluoroscopic examination, it could not be confirmed.Another observation was made using another device of the same type, and it was confirmed that the device had become caught between the stent and blood vessel, and the separated catheter tip was flowing in the blood vessel lumen.Since the separated part was small, the physician concluded that there would be no problem, and the procedure was completed as planned.No patient injury was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
D2b: pro code (product code): corrected.
 
Event Description
Iit was reported that the catheter issue occurred.The 100% stenosed target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified left common iliac artery.The opticross imaging catheter was advanced for ultrasound examination of the target lesion.During the procedure, treatment was performed via a contralateral approach.A 4fr sheath was retrogradely punctured from the inguinal region on the same side as the treatment site.A guidewire was manipulated to penetrate in a bidirectional manner.After pre-dilation inside the vessel, when the physician deployed the stent from the contralateral side without removing the device from the sheath outside the patient, the tip of the device got caught between the vessel wall and stent strut.The physician attempted to remove the device, but since it was stuck in the stent strut, it could not be easily extracted.As the physician pulled strongly, it became separated.Upon fluoroscopic examination, it could not be confirmed.Another observation was made using another device of the same type, and it was confirmed that the device had become caught between the stent and blood vessel, and the separated catheter tip was flowing in the blood vessel lumen.Since the separated part was small, the physician concluded that there would be no problem, and the procedure was completed as planned.No patient injury was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned for analysis.Visual and microscope inspection revealed the sheath assembly was kinked, and the tip was detached.The tip was not returned for analysis.Based on the evidence, the as reported codes of tip detached and catheter stuck in stent are confirmed,.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the catheter issue occurred.The 100% stenosed target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified left common iliac artery.The opticross imaging catheter was advanced for ultrasound examination of the target lesion.During the procedure, treatment was performed via a contralateral approach.A 4fr sheath was retrogradely punctured from the inguinal region on the same side as the treatment site.A guidewire was manipulated to penetrate in a bidirectional manner.After pre-dilation inside the vessel, when the physician deployed the stent from the contralateral side without removing the device from the sheath outside the patient, the tip of the device got caught between the vessel wall and stent strut.The physician attempted to remove the device, but since it was stuck in the stent strut, it could not be easily extracted.As the physician pulled strongly, it became separated.Upon fluoroscopic examination, it could not be confirmed.Another observation was made using another device of the same type, and it was confirmed that the device had become caught between the stent and blood vessel, and the separated catheter tip was flowing in the blood vessel lumen.Since the separated part was small, the physician concluded that there would be no problem, and the procedure was completed as planned.No patient injury was reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OPTICROSS 18
Type of Device
CATHETER, ULTRASOUND, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
2546 calle primera
alajuela
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
rachel shields
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6512422111
MDR Report Key18789910
MDR Text Key336350360
Report Number2124215-2024-11594
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ITX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/20/2024
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/27/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number44021
Device Catalogue Number44021
Device Lot Number0032377435
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/14/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/07/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
-
-