|
Model Number 44021 |
Device Problems
Entrapment of Device (1212); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 02/08/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the catheter issue occurred.The 100% stenosed target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified left common iliac artery.The opticross imaging catheter was advanced for ultrasound examination of the target lesion.During the procedure, treatment was performed via a contralateral approach.A 4fr sheath was retrogradely punctured from the inguinal region on the same side as the treatment site.A guidewire was manipulated to penetrate in a bidirectional manner.After pre-dilation inside the vessel, when the physician deployed the stent from the contralateral side without removing the device from the sheath outside the patient, the tip of the device got caught between the vessel wall and stent strut.The physician attempted to remove the device, but since it was stuck in the stent strut, it could not be easily extracted.As the physician pulled strongly, it became separated.Upon fluoroscopic examination, it could not be confirmed.Another observation was made using another device of the same type, and it was confirmed that the device had become caught between the stent and blood vessel, and the separated catheter tip was flowing in the blood vessel lumen.Since the separated part was small, the physician concluded that there would be no problem, and the procedure was completed as planned.No patient injury was reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the catheter issue occurred.The 100% stenosed target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified left common iliac artery.The opticross imaging catheter was advanced for ultrasound examination of the target lesion.During the procedure, treatment was performed via a contralateral approach.A 4fr sheath was retrogradely punctured from the inguinal region on the same side as the treatment site.A guidewire was manipulated to penetrate in a bidirectional manner.After pre-dilation inside the vessel, when the physician deployed the stent from the contralateral side without removing the device from the sheath outside the patient, the tip of the device got caught between the vessel wall and stent strut.The physician attempted to remove the device, but since it was stuck in the stent strut, it could not be easily extracted.As the physician pulled strongly, it became separated.Upon fluoroscopic examination, it could not be confirmed.Another observation was made using another device of the same type, and it was confirmed that the device had become caught between the stent and blood vessel, and the separated catheter tip was flowing in the blood vessel lumen.Since the separated part was small, the physician concluded that there would be no problem, and the procedure was completed as planned.No patient injury was reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
D2b: pro code (product code): corrected.
|
|
Event Description
|
Iit was reported that the catheter issue occurred.The 100% stenosed target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified left common iliac artery.The opticross imaging catheter was advanced for ultrasound examination of the target lesion.During the procedure, treatment was performed via a contralateral approach.A 4fr sheath was retrogradely punctured from the inguinal region on the same side as the treatment site.A guidewire was manipulated to penetrate in a bidirectional manner.After pre-dilation inside the vessel, when the physician deployed the stent from the contralateral side without removing the device from the sheath outside the patient, the tip of the device got caught between the vessel wall and stent strut.The physician attempted to remove the device, but since it was stuck in the stent strut, it could not be easily extracted.As the physician pulled strongly, it became separated.Upon fluoroscopic examination, it could not be confirmed.Another observation was made using another device of the same type, and it was confirmed that the device had become caught between the stent and blood vessel, and the separated catheter tip was flowing in the blood vessel lumen.Since the separated part was small, the physician concluded that there would be no problem, and the procedure was completed as planned.No patient injury was reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned for analysis.Visual and microscope inspection revealed the sheath assembly was kinked, and the tip was detached.The tip was not returned for analysis.Based on the evidence, the as reported codes of tip detached and catheter stuck in stent are confirmed,.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the catheter issue occurred.The 100% stenosed target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and severely calcified left common iliac artery.The opticross imaging catheter was advanced for ultrasound examination of the target lesion.During the procedure, treatment was performed via a contralateral approach.A 4fr sheath was retrogradely punctured from the inguinal region on the same side as the treatment site.A guidewire was manipulated to penetrate in a bidirectional manner.After pre-dilation inside the vessel, when the physician deployed the stent from the contralateral side without removing the device from the sheath outside the patient, the tip of the device got caught between the vessel wall and stent strut.The physician attempted to remove the device, but since it was stuck in the stent strut, it could not be easily extracted.As the physician pulled strongly, it became separated.Upon fluoroscopic examination, it could not be confirmed.Another observation was made using another device of the same type, and it was confirmed that the device had become caught between the stent and blood vessel, and the separated catheter tip was flowing in the blood vessel lumen.Since the separated part was small, the physician concluded that there would be no problem, and the procedure was completed as planned.No patient injury was reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|