It was reported that during a web embolization procedure, the device did not take the proper shape when it was advanced through a siphon, which was reported to be tortuous, to be placed into the aneurysm.When the physician attempted to re-sheath and redeploy the web, it would not open in the same exact position.During removal, the web would not re-sheath.A catheter was advanced to the aneurysm neck, and the web was forcibly pulled back into the catheter.The patient had collaterals forming and little deficits suspected.The physician suspected that the patient may had a minor stroke from either a clot or damage to vessel due to aggressively trying to re-sheath device.The patient was administered aggrastat interprocedurally.After a few days, the patient was reported to be ¿perfectly well¿ and was discharged.
|
Correction : h1 was changed from malfunction to serious injury.The investigation of the returned web system found the web implant to be in good shape, and within dimensional specification upon receipt.Furthermore, the web implant fully opened upon deployment during functional testing.The returned microcatheter was found wrinkled between 20cm to 30cm from the distal tip and flattened at 1cm from the distal tip, which may have caused or contributed to the alleged advancement and re-sheathing difficulty issue as described in the reported event.The investigation of the returned device did not find any damage or other anomaly that would have caused or contributed to the reported complaint.
|