The electronic device logfile was available for the investigation.No product malfunction was reported by the user.Based on the logfile analysis, no indications for a device malfunction were found either.The case in question was started at 10:06am in man/spont mode and continued from 10:12am in volume mode.In the following, the device alarmed volume not attained and mv low.At 10:17am, the user switched to man/spont for a few minutes before therapy was continued in volume mode (10:22am).During the following automatic ventilation, the ventilator repeatedly went into pressure limitation and alarmed accordingly pressure limitation and volume not attained as well as apnoe.At 10:30am, a significant leakage (0.7 l/min) was detected.Based on the patient gas measurement data, a disconnection has obviously taken place.This may have been the time of the deflagration.At this time, the inspiratory oxygen concentration was approx.85 vol.%.The user temporarily switched to man/spont and then back to volume mode.The following ventilation was initially characterized by high airway pressures (pressure limitation), corresponding alarms were issued - as before.Ventilation stabilized from around 10:47am and remained normal until the switch to standby at 11:14am.Dräger finally concludes that most likely, the deflagration was caused by a tube leak - possibly due to damage during the surgical procedure - and the resulting increased oxygen concentration in the operating area with the simultaneous use of electrosurgical devices.Finally, a device malfunction as root cause for the reported deflagration could be excluded based on the performed investigation.
|