TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION 8F ANGIO-SEAL VIP VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICE, OUS; DEVICE, HEMOSTASIS, VASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/08/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
D6a: implanted date: device was not implanted.D6b: explanted date: device was not explanted.A review of the device history record of the product code/lot number combination was conducted with no findings.The actual device was not available; therefore, the actual device will not be returned for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.
|
|
Event Description
|
The user facility reported that the involved angio-seal procedure sheath was removed as per normal procedure.When the locator/insertion assembly was attempted to be inserted into the puncture site over the guidewire, the tip of the insertion sheath was observed to be kinked.The device was not used, and manual compression was applied to achieve hemostasis.Subsequently, hemostasis was successfully achieved by manual compression only.The estimated blood loss was less than 250cc's.The procedure before deploying the device was percutaneous coronary intervention (pci).A pre-deployment angiogram was performed.The size of the sheath ancillary used was 7 french.The puncture site was proximal to the inguinal ligament of the right common femoral artery.The vessel's diameter was 7 mm.The event occurred intra-operative.The patient was not injured during the event surgical intervention was not needed.There is not a direct allegation that the reported device caused or contributed to patient injury and/or need for medical intervention.No equipment or other devices were used with the involved angio-seal device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1 to provide the completed investigation results.The actual device was not returned; therefore, an evaluation of the actual device was unable to be conducted.Since the sample was not available for evaluation, the complaint could not be confirmed.The exact root cause was unable to be determined.The likely cause was determined to have been damage sustained to the sheath due to off axis loading during insertion.The device history record (dhr) review determined that the device was in a conforming state when released from terumo control.There is no indication that any manufacturing, design, or quality system issues may have led to this event.Currently, no action is recommended since this risk evaluation is within the predetermined limits in the failure mode and effects analysis (fmea)/hazard based risk table (hbrt).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|