EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 11500A |
Device Problems
Perivalvular Leak (1457); Central Regurgitation (4068)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 02/08/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned to edwards for evaluation as it remains implanted.Attempts to retrieve additional information is in process.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported a patient with a 25mm 11500a aortic valve implanted 22 days underwent valve-in-valve procedure due to perivalvular leak (pvl) on the non-coronary cusp, moderate to severe central aortic insufficiency, and a gradient of 20+ mmhg.It was reported the patient underwent complicated surgery where the aortic valve leaflets could not be fully debrided; the valve appeared to have been implanted in a canted position.In addition to avr patient also underwent tricuspid valve repair with a 34mm 4900 tricuspid ring.It is possible the surgical valve was bent during implant, although this has not been confirmed.A 29mm s3ur transcatheter valve was implanted low (50/50) to seal the pvl and fix the central leak, with minimal final gradient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device history record was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Regurgitation is considered to be a perivalvular leak (pvl) if a turbulent eccentric jet originates between the bio-prosthetic sewing ring and the annulus.Pvl can occur in the mitral and aortic position for similar reasons.In the early postoperative period, the highest incidence of pvl has been seen in patients developing infective endocarditis, which is most likely attributed to inadequate peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis or nosocomial infection.Annular calcification is also a risk factor for the development of peri-operative pvl as the bio-prosthesis may not seat properly after debridement.Technique related factors, such as incorrect valve sizing, have been shown to contribute to the development of pvl.Anatomical factors may create difficulty seating the bio-prosthetic valve resulting in pvl.The anatomy of the annulus may induce mechanical stresses along the rigid bio-prosthetic ring which can influence long-term valve performance and durability.A diseased or rigid annulus can potentially increase the mechanical stress on the prosthetic valve, leading to pvl.The most likely cause is procedural factors, including incomplete debridement of leaflet tissue at implant.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|