• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL HD EPSCP,4.0,30,167,MITEK; ARTHROSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL HD EPSCP,4.0,30,167,MITEK; ARTHROSCOPE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 242018
Device Problems Break (1069); Crack (1135); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/01/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).The device manufacture date is currently unavailable.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received at the service center evaluated.During the service evaluation the following defects were identified: chipped/shaved/delaminated lenses.Per service reports, this complaint can be confirmed.The defective parts needs to be replaced to resolve the issues.The faulty parts was identified as the root cause for the device failure during the service evaluation.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Device history review: manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the affiliate in japan that the hd epscp,4.0,30,167,mitek device had cracked lens and the focus adjustment had limited range of motion.During in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that the device had chipped/shaved/delaminated lenses.There was no procedure nor patient involvement reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HD EPSCP,4.0,30,167,MITEK
Type of Device
ARTHROSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle MA CH-24 00
SZ   CH-2400
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key18839164
MDR Text Key337684456
Report Number1221934-2024-00671
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRX
UDI-Device Identifier10886705029150
UDI-Public10886705029150
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K080560
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/05/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number242018
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/27/2023
Date Manufacturer Received03/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-