• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 W/SA2.0 20 & DISTAL CATHETER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 W/SA2.0 20 & DISTAL CATHETER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX648T
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Hydrocephalus (3272)
Event Date 02/19/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shunt system (#fx648t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2021.According to the complainant, the shunt system showed a dysfunction.The patient underwent a revision procedure performed on (b)(6) 2024.The complainant device has returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 85 years.Weight: 70 kgs.Height: 156 cm.Gender: unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Visual inspection: during the investigation, no significant deformations or damage of the valve were determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the functional deviations or other abnormalities in the product, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valves operate within the permissible tolerance in their respective relevant positions.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function operates as expected and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, no deposits were found in both valves.To make the deposits in the shunt system more visible, they were colored using a staining solution.Results: based on our investigation results, we cannot determine functional deviations or other abnormalities in the product.How the abovementioned functional impairment occurred is not clear to us at the time of examination.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 W/SA2.0 20 & DISTAL CATHETER
Type of Device
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key18847325
MDR Text Key337017626
Report Number3004721439-2024-00051
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906502065
UDI-Public4041906502065
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K190174
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/06/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/06/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model NumberFX648T
Device Catalogue NumberFX648T
Device Lot Number20047491
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/22/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/22/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/30/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age85 YR
Patient Weight70 KG
-
-