Model Number 7110-0619-A2 |
Device Problem
Component Missing (2306)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/21/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A search for non-conformances associated with this part lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was stated to be available for return to the manufacturer but has not yet been received for analysis.The alleged product issue could not be identified.If the device is received at a later date, an investigation will be performed and a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that an embolization coil implant was missing from its delivery pusher; the device was being advanced in the microcatheter where the implant was noticed to be missing under fluoroscopy.The coil was not present in the microcatheter or packaging hoop or sterile field.A new device was used to continue the procedure.There was no injury or intervention.It was reported that there were ¿no patient care sequelae.¿.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that an embolization coil implant was missing from its delivery pusher; the device was being advanced in the microcatheter where the implant was noticed to be missing under fluoroscopy.The coil was not present in the microcatheter or packaging hoop or sterile field.A new device was used to continue the procedure.There was no injury or intervention.It was reported that there were ¿no patient care sequelae.¿.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported complaint is confirmed.The investigation of the returned coil system found the implant was not attached to the pusher, which is consistent with the reported event.The implant was found separated from the pusher and stuck within the dispenser hoop upon receipt.Further inspection found the implant to be deformed.The investigation found the pusher¿s monofilament with a tensile break shape at the tip, which is consistent with the device experiencing force that exceeded the strength of the monofilament causing the implant to separate from the pusher.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the pusher damage, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing forces over specification.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|