• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. HYDROFRAME-10-AV; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION COIL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. HYDROFRAME-10-AV; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION COIL Back to Search Results
Model Number 7110-0619-A2
Device Problem Component Missing (2306)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/21/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with this part lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was stated to be available for return to the manufacturer but has not yet been received for analysis.The alleged product issue could not be identified.If the device is received at a later date, an investigation will be performed and a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that an embolization coil implant was missing from its delivery pusher; the device was being advanced in the microcatheter where the implant was noticed to be missing under fluoroscopy.The coil was not present in the microcatheter or packaging hoop or sterile field.A new device was used to continue the procedure.There was no injury or intervention.It was reported that there were ¿no patient care sequelae.¿.
 
Event Description
It was reported that an embolization coil implant was missing from its delivery pusher; the device was being advanced in the microcatheter where the implant was noticed to be missing under fluoroscopy.The coil was not present in the microcatheter or packaging hoop or sterile field.A new device was used to continue the procedure.There was no injury or intervention.It was reported that there were ¿no patient care sequelae.¿.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported complaint is confirmed.The investigation of the returned coil system found the implant was not attached to the pusher, which is consistent with the reported event.The implant was found separated from the pusher and stuck within the dispenser hoop upon receipt.Further inspection found the implant to be deformed.The investigation found the pusher¿s monofilament with a tensile break shape at the tip, which is consistent with the device experiencing force that exceeded the strength of the monofilament causing the implant to separate from the pusher.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the pusher damage, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing forces over specification.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HYDROFRAME-10-AV
Type of Device
NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION COIL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key18852906
MDR Text Key337747061
Report Number2032493-2024-00195
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00816777023704
UDI-Public(01)00816777023704(11)231025(17)280930(10)0000449976
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090357
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/22/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/06/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number7110-0619-A2
Device Lot Number0000449976
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/29/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/25/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-