• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 3; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 3; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number VIO 3
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Event Date 02/19/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The involved esu was returned and inspected/tested (note: since the neutral electrode was from another manufacturer, it was not available for an evaluation by erbe.Therefore, an assessment of the accessories' safety and functionality is unknown to us.).The unit was found to be functioning as intended.The evaluation included an electrical safety check, a functional check of each of the equipment's features, and a power output check.The generator was/is within specifications and all features were/are functioning properly (note: an evaluation of the esu's chronological data revealed that during procedure the unit displayed symmetry warnings regarding the neutral electrode.).In addition, no anomalies were found in the device history record (dhr) of the device.In conclusion, no erbe equipment problem was found that would have caused or contributed to the incident.There are many possibilities as to the cause of the event.It could have been caused by a defect of the neutral electrode (i.E., the gel), incorrect preparation of the neutral electrode site or application of the neutral electrode, the esu's setting(s) being too high, activation time(s) being too long and/or the times between applications being too short which caused excessive heating under the neutral electrode, the neutral electrode became partially detached from the patient during use, etc.(note: the esu was displaying warning messages involving the neutral electrode during the surgery.).Based upon the limited information provided, the lesion was mostly a thermal burn (although an allergy reaction cannot be ruled).However, the size of the skin lesion combined with this severity of the burn is very unusual for being a thermally induced necrosis.Nevertheless, there are many warnings in the unit's user manual addressing neutral electrode burns.Finally, no conclusive determination could be made as to the exact cause(s) of the incident.No trends have been identified and erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient incident occurred with the electrosurgical unit (esu/generator) during a hip implantation procedure on the patient's left side.The esu was used with valleylab handle [part number (p/n) information not provided (ni), lot number (l/n) ni]) and a dual surface neutral electrode from skintact (p/n rsw 213/5, l/n 230821-0808).The neutral electrode was attached to the patient's right thigh.No information was provided regarding the unit's settings.Upon the procedure, a skin lesion (burn/necrosis) was found under the neutral electrode in a horseshoe-shape of approximate 200 cm² in size.Initially, the lesion was considered as a 1st degree burn, but over the course of a week it developed into a 2nd degree burn.Due to the necrosis, a skin transplant is being planned.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE VIO 3
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM  72072
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM   72072
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-8764
7709554400
MDR Report Key18855357
MDR Text Key337094373
Report Number9610614-2024-00019
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K190823
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/07/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/07/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVIO 3
Device Catalogue Number10160-000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/04/2024
Date Manufacturer Received02/28/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/08/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age82 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight88 KG
-
-