• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC VASOVIEW HEMOPRO 2; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC VASOVIEW HEMOPRO 2; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Model Number VH-4000
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/15/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device has not yet been returned to maquet cardiac surgery for evaluation.We are following up with the customer for the return of the device.A supplemental report will be submitted if the device is received.
 
Event Description
The hospital reported that during an endoscopic vein harvesting procedure, vasoview hemopro 2 c ring component broke in the tunnel.Per photos provided by the complainant, the c-ring has completely detached from the device.They noticed that the c ring was slightly protruding from the end of the cannula even when the blue c ring slider was completely pulled back.(about 1mm) they elected to use it anyway.When they attempted to push out the c ring to isolate a branch, they saw that it came out funny as if the two wires holding the c ring were detached from the usual parallel configuration.They pulled out completely from the tunnel and then saw that one limb of the c ring was disconnected from the cannula.They cut the second limb of the c ring.They kept the same hp2 to finish sealing and cutting the remaining branches who didn't require c ring.Additional incisions requires to ligate a very large branch they thought they would've needed the c ring to isolate.They didn't have to create an incision to retrieve the c ring.They removed it and used a second c-vh-4000.Apart from this opening to seal and ligate the large branch, no delays were encountered.No bleeding following the procedure and a very good quality of vein.The patient wasn't injured.
 
Event Description
N/a.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Trackwise (b)(4).Updated sections: b4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6, h10, h11 corrected sections: h2--type of reportable event corrected from "malfunction" to "serious injury" the device was returned to the factory for evaluation on 03/12/2024.Photographs were provided by the account.A photographic inspection was conducted.The heater wire and clear silicone insulation were observed to be intact from what is visible in the photograph.The scope wash tubing and half of the c-ring were observed separate to the cannula.The other half of the c-ring is not visible.An investigation was conducted on 03/14/2024.A visual inspection was conducted.Signs of clinical use and evidence of blood were observed.The heater wire was observed to be detached from the tip of the hot jaw and bent downwards.The clear silicone insulation of both the hot and cold jaws was observed to be peeled completely off the jaws and was not returned for evaluation.The c-ring was observed to be cut in half down the center with signs of melting near the flanking curved areas.The other half of the c-ring and scope wash tubing were not attached to the cannula and were not returned.Based on the photographic inspection, returned condition of the device, and the evaluation results, the reported failure "break; c-ring", as well as the analyzed failures "material twisted/bent; wire" and "peeled; jaw" was confirmed.Specific actions for the reported failure, break; c-ring, are being maintained and documented under maquet's corrective and preventive action (capa) system.The lot # 3000353044 history record review was completed.There were no ncmrs, rework, or deviations documented for the reported lot number.Based on the dhr/lhr review results, it was determined that there is no relation between the batch manufacturing process and the reported failure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VASOVIEW HEMOPRO 2
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC
45 barbour pond drive
wayne NJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC
45 barbour pond drive
wayne NJ
Manufacturer Contact
arelean guzman
45 barbour pond drive
wayne, NJ 
MDR Report Key18873401
MDR Text Key337445372
Report Number2242352-2024-00225
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
UDI-Device Identifier00607567700406
UDI-Public00607567700406
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K101274
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Administrator/Supervisor
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/05/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/11/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVH-4000
Device Catalogue NumberVH-4000
Device Lot Number3000353044
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Manufacturer Received04/10/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/07/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-