• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION RESONATE X4 CRT-D; IMPLANTABLE DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION RESONATE X4 CRT-D; IMPLANTABLE DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number G447
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Failure to Capture (1081); Low impedance (2285); Device Sensing Problem (2917)
Patient Problems Hematoma (1884); Syncope/Fainting (4411)
Event Date 03/03/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a few days after implant of the cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) system, the left ventricular (lv) pace impedance was less than 200 ohms and there was loss of capture in certain programming configurations.The impedance measurement the day prior was 440 ohms.Some noise was observed when measuring impedance and the lv threshold was highly variable.Engineering reviewed the device data and determined there was an issue with the lv pacing channel of the crt-d device and immediate device replacement was recommended.The patient had experienced syncope and was re-admitted to the hospital.It was noted that the patient had upcoming chemotherapy appointments and there was also a large hematoma over the device implant site.The device was subsequently replaced and is expected to be returned for analysis.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a few days after implant of the cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) system, the left ventricular (lv) pace impedance was less than 200 ohms and there was loss of capture in certain programming configurations.The impedance measurement the day prior was 440 ohms.Some noise was observed when measuring impedance and the lv threshold was highly variable.Engineering reviewed the device data and determined there was an issue with the lv pacing channel of the crt-d device and immediate device replacement was recommended.The patient had experienced syncope and was re-admitted to the hospital.It was noted that the patient had upcoming chemotherapy appointments and there was also a large hematoma over the device implant site.The device was subsequently replaced and is expected to be returned for analysis.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.It was additionally reported that the pocket hematoma was drained during the device replacement procedure.The lv lead was tested in both bipolar and unipolar configurations and capture was confirmed, and impedances were stable.The lv lead remains in service.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESONATE X4 CRT-D
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key18876988
MDR Text Key337348877
Report Number2124215-2024-14616
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
P010012/S436
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/25/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/11/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberG447
Device Catalogue NumberG447
Device Lot Number310378
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/15/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
-
-