|
Model Number 97715 |
Device Problems
Delayed Charge Time (2586); Electromagnetic Compatibility Problem (2927)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/03/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
The patient reported through a manufacturer representative (rep) that they had experienced inefficient implantable neurostimulator (ins) charging.It was stated that the patient had two inss implanted in their lower back and that ¿when both are charged, it took time to charge one of them.¿ it was noted that the patient¿s ¿charging efficiency was very good and the patient controller was 100% charged.The patient was advised that it may take some time depending on the communication environment, but the patient stated ¿that this had never happened before.¿ there were no external factors in particular reported that may have led or contributed to the issue.The issue remained unresolved at the time of report.Additional information was sought regarding the patient¿s other system, whether the patient was trying to charge both stimulators at the same time, if the patient was able to charge normally when only one stimulator and recharger pair was being used at a time, and if the cause of the issue had been determined; however, the rep indicated that they were unable to obtain further information from the customer.It was unknown whether any surgical interventions were performed to address the issue.The patient was alive with no health damage at the time of report.No complications were reported or anticipated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from the rep reporting that the recharger was replaced.As there was no contact from patient since then, it seems the problem may have been resolved.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|