|
Model Number ONYXNG22522UX |
Device Problems
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Positioning Problem (3009)
|
Patient Problems
Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/01/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
An attempt was made to use one onyx frontier coronary drug eluting stent to treat a highly tortuous, moderately calcified lesion with 80% stenosis located in the mid right coronary artery (rca).The device was inspected with no issues.Negative prep was performed with no issues.The lesion was pre-dilated.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.Resistance was encounteredwhen advancing the device.Excessive force was not used.It was reported that stent dislodgement occurred during delivery to the lesion.The rca was engaged with a non-medtronic guide extension catheter (gec) for support.After pre-dilation the stent was advanced but could not get past the tortuous proximal segment.Upon retraction, without gec involvement, the balloon easily slipped out of the undeployed stent.There was no resistance noted during attempted withdrawal of the device.The stent was left in the proximal rca.A 1.5mm non-medtronic balloon was inserted in the stent and dilated.The stent was serially dilated with bigger balloons until fully deployed.Then the distal and a proximal lesions were able to be stented without difficulty.It is believed that the gec was a co ntributor in addition to the amount of calcium within the artery.The patient is alive with no further injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: it was later confirmed that the stent dislodgement occurred during removal following a failed delivery as opposed to during delivery.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: annex d codes added.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|