• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH X3 TRIATHLON INSERT CS NUM6 10MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH X3 TRIATHLON INSERT CS NUM6 10MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5531-G-610-E
Device Problem Unstable (1667)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Joint Laxity (4526)
Event Date 02/21/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Device not returned to the manufacturer.
 
Event Description
As reported: "on (b)(6) 2024 we were scheduled for a retinacular repair and i&d of a right total knee arthroplasty.Upon exposure to the joint, dr.Noticed that the 6x10 tibia insert was "rocking" in the tibial tray.After inspection of the insert, it appeared as if it was correctly engaged to the tibial baseplate, however was still rocking posteriorly.We took note of this and assumed that soft tissue was preventing the tibial insert from fully locking into the baseplate.We proceeded forward with the explant of the device, upon which dr.Examined the explanted 6x10 insert.Here, he noticed two "bevels on the posterior aspects of the tibial insert.He expressed his concerns that he thought something wasn't correct.He continued with his soft tissue work, i&d, and we proceeded to trial for a new poly.Once we chose our new cs poly, he compared the two on the back table.It was here that we noticed a difference in the two implants.The new 6x12 cs insert did not have the "bevels" posteriorly like the explanted 6x10 cs did.We thought maybe it was damaged when initially implanted but the bevels were oddly symmetric on both the medial and lateral aspect of the implant.Upon implantation of the new 6x12 cs insert, the poly was stable and the proceeded to close.He believes the unstable 6x10 poly caused the patient pain/instability)." rep confirmed only the insert was revised.Surgeon would like to know if this issue has been reported previously.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
X3 TRIATHLON INSERT CS NUM6 10MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
arokiya raj
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key18892998
MDR Text Key337516545
Report Number0002249697-2024-00392
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBH
UDI-Device Identifier07613327390575
UDI-Public07613327390575
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K173849
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/13/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/13/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number5531-G-610-E
Device Lot NumberLH8KP9
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/21/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/03/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age56 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-