The electronic log file and the replaced motor were available for investigation.The reported ventilator failure could be reconstructed by means of the information stored in the log file.During the case in question, the apollo detected a deviation between the measured and the expected position of the ventilator piston.The device reacted in accordance with its implemented safety concept as it interrupted automatic ventilation, switched to man/spont mode and generated a corresponding audible and visible ventilator fail alarm.In such case both manual ventilation and monitoring functions will remain unaffected and available.Hence, the user is able to ventilate the patient manually and monitor relevant information regarding ventilation and gas delivery.The returned motor was inspected in the laboratory.It ran freely and no failure of the position detection system was identified.But unusual noices were observed when running the motor indicating faulty motor brushes or springs which most likely caused the detected deviation between measured and expected piston position.Dräger finally concludes that the device behaved as specified upon the malfunction of a single component.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.The field failure rate is subject to permanent monitoring by the responsible product quality board and is rated as acceptable.
|