• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC REDIGUARD IAB: 8FR 40CC; SYSTEM, BALLOON, INTRA-AORTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC REDIGUARD IAB: 8FR 40CC; SYSTEM, BALLOON, INTRA-AORTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IAB-S840C
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 01/23/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that "after insertion of a balloon catheter, a machine alarm was found, and after removal, blood leakage from the balloon was found, and the patient's counterpulsation was normal after replacement with a new catheter".The 2nd iab was inserted at the same insertion site.Additional information states that there was no patient harm or injury.The patient status is reported as "fine".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn#(b)(4).Returned for investigation was a 40cc 8.0fr rediguard intra-aortic balloon catheter (iabc) with the original packaging box that matches the serial number on the returned sample.Returned with the sample were supplied kit components including 40cc inflation driveline tubing, 9fr super arrow-flex (saf) sheath and data-scope inflation driveline tubing.The returned 9fr super arrow-flex (saf) sheath appeared used; dried blood was noted on the exterior surfaces of the saf sheath and clear fluid was noted within the sheath sidearm.Upon return, the one-way valve was tethered to the short driveline tubing.The bladder was fully unwrapped.Multiple bends to the iabc central lumen, consistent with flattened surfaces, were noted at approximately 55.5cm, 56.1cm and 57.8cm from the iabc distal tip.Dried blood was noted on the exterior surfaces of the returned sample.Dried blood was also noted within the iabc helium pathway.The bladder thickness was measured at six points with measurements ranging from 0.0070in-0.0077in and was within specification.The one-way valve was tested and passed.A vacuum was pulled on the one-way valve, and it held for at least 1 minute and then 30 seconds five separate times.The iabc central lumen was aspirated and flushed using a 60cc lab-inventory syringe.No abnormalities or debris were noted.The iabc was leak tested and a leak was immediately detected from the bladder membrane.Under microscopic inspection, a puncture on the iabc bladder, consistent with contact from a sharp object, was noted at approximately 24.2cm from the iabc distal tip.No other leaks were detected.A lab inventory 0.025in guidewire was back loaded through the iabc distal tip.Resistance was noted at approximately 55.5cm, 56.2cm and 58cm from the iabc distal tip, which are the locations of the previously noted flattened surfaces.The guidewire was able to advance through the central lumen.No blood or debris was noted.The guidewire was front loaded through the iabc luer.Resistance was noted at approximately 27.2cm, 28.6cm and 29.2cm from the iabc luer, which are the locations of the previously noted flattened surfaces.The guidewire was able to advance through the central lumen.No blood or debris was noted.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted for the lot number with no relevant findings.The device passed all manufacturing specifications prior to release.The reported complaint that "blood leakage from the balloon was found" is confirmed.During the investigation, a puncture to the bladder, consistent with contact from a sharp object, was found on the iabc bladder which caused the reported complaint and allowed blood to enter the helium pathway.No other leaks were detected during functional testing.Based on a review of the device history record (dhr), the product met specification upon release; however, the specifications were not met during the complaint investigation due to the bladder leak.The root cause of the bladder leak is undetermined.The most probable potential cause of how the catheter came into contact with a sharp object is customer handling.No further action required at this time.This will be monitored for any developing trends.Other remarks: n/a.Corrected data: n/a.
 
Event Description
It was reported that "after insertion of a balloon catheter, a machine alarm was found, and after removal, blood leakage from the balloon was found, and the patient's counterpulsation was normal after replacement with a new catheter".The 2nd iab was inserted at the same insertion site.Additional information states that there was no patient harm or injury.The patient status is reported as "fine".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REDIGUARD IAB: 8FR 40CC
Type of Device
SYSTEM, BALLOON, INTRA-AORTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC
morrisville NC
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
16 elizabeth drive
chelmsford MA 01824
Manufacturer Contact
katharine tarpley
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville, NC 27560
MDR Report Key18903393
MDR Text Key337744779
Report Number3010532612-2024-00204
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSP
UDI-Device Identifier00801902002679
UDI-Public00801902002679
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K981660
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/04/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/14/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberIAB-S840C
Device Lot Number18F23G0010
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/06/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-