• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON GMBH BD BBL¿ MARTIN-LEWIS AGAR; CULTURE MEDIA, FOR ISOLATION OF PATHOGENIC NEISSERIA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON GMBH BD BBL¿ MARTIN-LEWIS AGAR; CULTURE MEDIA, FOR ISOLATION OF PATHOGENIC NEISSERIA Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 254029
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/20/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported while testing with bd bbl¿ martin-lewis agar, proteus species was not inhibited by the agar for twenty plates and overgrowth was observed.There was no health impact or consequences reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.3.A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.6.Investigation summary: it was reported that normally proteus spp are inhibited for growth on this medium due to the antibiotics that are included into the medium cfr package insert.With this lot the overgrowth of proteus spp is noticed.The complaint history was reviewed, and no similar complaints were reported for the affected catalog number.A trend was not identified.The batch history review did not indicate any discrepancies.All release testing was satisfactory, and no deviations were observed.Retain samples were analyzed in a performance test using proteus mirabilis atcc 43071, proteus mirabilis atcc 14153 and proteus mirabilis atcc 12453.No deviation was detected, and growth was still inhibited after 48 hours at 35-37°c in co2 atmosphere incubation.No return samples were provided by the customer for analysis.A picture was shared showing a plate with growth of bacteria.Based upon our investigation, we have excluded any systematic failure in our manufacturing process.All the release testing was satisfactory and additionally, the retest performed on the retain samples with proteus mirabilis atcc 43071, proteus mirabilis atcc 14153 and proteus mirabilis atcc 12453 was satisfactory.Since no trend was identified and no process deviation could be detected, further actions are not indicated at this point.Based on the results of the investigation and the evaluation of retain samples we cannot confirm this complaint.However, bd will continue monitoring incoming complaint with similar failure mode.
 
Event Description
It was reported while testing with bd bbl¿ martin-lewis agar, proteus species was not inhibited by the agar for twenty plates and overgrowth was observed.There was no health impact or consequences reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD BBL¿ MARTIN-LEWIS AGAR
Type of Device
CULTURE MEDIA, FOR ISOLATION OF PATHOGENIC NEISSERIA
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON GMBH
8-12 tullastrasse
heidelberg 69126
GM  69126
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON DICKINSON GMBH
8-12 tullastrasse
heidelberg 69126
GM   69126
Manufacturer Contact
jo doyka
7 loveton circle
sparks, MD 21152
4103164000
MDR Report Key18904319
MDR Text Key337761380
Report Number9680577-2024-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JTY
UDI-Device Identifier30382902540299
UDI-Public(01)30382902540299
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBE
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/14/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date02/26/2024
Device Catalogue Number254029
Device Lot Number3332386
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/28/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/28/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-