• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number PCB00
Device Problems Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse (1254); Failure to Fold (1255); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The following article was received based on a literature review: article: video analysis of optic-haptic-interaction during hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens implantation using preloaded injectors an observational, retrospective study was done to compare the optic-haptic interaction of different hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (iols) after using six preloaded injectors.The video-recordings of procedures on a total of 388 eyes (n=388 eyes) that underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (iol) implantation were reviewed.For six preloaded injectors: multisert (hoya surgical optics) [system 1], tecnis simplicity (johnson & johnson vision) [system 2], tecnis itec (johnson & johnson vision) [system 3], autonome (alcon, laboratories) [system 4], bluesert (carl zeiss meditec) [system 5], and prosert (ophthalmopro gmbh) [system 6], the time of iol delivery and observation of iol insertion and optic-haptic-interaction were noted.A centurion (alcon, usa) or whitestar signature (johnson & johnson, usa) phacoemulsification machine were used for the surgeries.Systems 2 and 3 were used in implantation of the tecnis iols (tecnis dib00 and tecnis pcb00).The same ophthalmic viscosurgical device (ovd) (hydroxypropylmethylcellulose [20.0 mg]) at room temperature (20¿23° c) was used in all cases.Events included: deformed delivery behavior: system 2: in the leading haptic (19.5%) and in the trailing haptics (6.1%).System 3: in the leading haptic (14.1%) and in trailing haptics (4%).Adhesions: system 2 (43.9%): adhesion between two haptics (21.9%) and haptic-optic adhesion (21.9%) system 3 (52.5%): between two haptics (22.2%), and between haptic and optic (30.3%) system 2 (28.1%) and system 3 (32.3%) required additional manipulation to release the adhesion and perform rotational adjustments to optimize the iol¿s orientation within the central of the capsular bag.System 3 showed the longest mean delivery time (34.8 ± 9.8).There are no indications in the article of any interventions provided.A copy of the article is attached to this report.A separate report will be submitted for the system 2 lens.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2: mean age 68.6 ± 12.6.Section a3: 54 female and 45 male patients.Sections a4, a5: information unknown/not provided.Section b3: date of event: exact dates not provided.Article acceptance date is november 9, 2023.Section d4: catalog number: complete catalog number is unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Section d4: serial number: unknown, information not provided.Section d4: expiration date: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Section d4: udi number: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Section d6a - implant date: unknown/ not provided section d6b - explant date: n/a, lens remains implanted.Section h3 - other (81): the implant was not returned for evaluation as it remains implanted.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review and possible product return and evaluation, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h4: device manufacture date: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Citation: w.Yan, a.F.Borkenstein, r.Khoramnia, e.-m.Borkenstein, g.U.Auffarth; video analysis of optic-haptic-interaction during hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens implantation using preloaded injectors; yan et al.Bmc ophthalmology; https://doi.Org/10.1186/s12886-023-03216-5.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key18908959
MDR Text Key337750188
Report Number3012236936-2024-00576
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
UDI-Public(01)
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P980040
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/14/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/14/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPCB00
Device Catalogue NumberPCB00
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/20/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-