• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACCOLADE MRI EL DR; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACCOLADE MRI EL DR; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number L331
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Over-Sensing (1438); Pacing Problem (1439); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/04/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient implanted with this pacemaker had undergone multiple programming sessions since implant to optimize minute ventilation (mv) sensor and accelerometer (xl) sensor driven pacing due to difficulty raising and raising his heart rate above 60 bpm with activity, especially while using a stationary bike for exercise.Following a stress test and reprogramming on (b)(6) 2023, the device reportedly worked, and then the patient's heart rate jumped from 140 bpm, spiked up to 170 bpm, and then lowered again.Review of remote monitoring data revealed stored pacemaker mediated tachycardia (pmt) episodes, premature ventricular contractions (pvcs), and possible retrograde conduction.In (b)(6) 2023, technical services (ts) discussed troubleshooting options and additional programming considerations, reminding the patient to take deeper and slower breaths.Additional programming changes were peformed in (b)(6) 2024.It was noted that the patient received appropriate rate response while riding upright on the stationary bike, but not when leaning forward while exercising.A request was made to have data from this device analyzed due to the numerous attempts at reprogramming to address the patient's needs.Data analysis indicated that the mv sensor had been disabled (b)(4) of the device's implanted time due ot noise and rythmiq episodes suggested there was av block at higher rates.Ts recommended further evaluation and reprogramming, accounting for these additional factors pertaining to patient's underlying conditions.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The local area field representative was contacted for additional information.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient implanted with this pacemaker had undergone multiple programming sessions since implant to optimize minute ventilation (mv) sensor and accelerometer (xl) sensor driven pacing due to difficulty raising his heart rate above 60 bpm with activity, especially while using a stationary bike for exercise.Following a stress test and reprogramming on (b)(6) 2023, the device reportedly worked, and then the patient's heart rate jumped from 140 bpm, spiked up to 170 bpm, and then lowered again.Review of remote monitoring data revealed stored pacemaker mediated tachycardia (pmt) episodes, premature ventricular contractions (pvcs), and possible retrograde conduction.In (b)(6) 2023, technical services (ts) discussed troubleshooting options and additional programming considerations, reminding the patient to take deeper and slower breaths.Additional programming changes were performed in (b)(6) 2024.It was noted that the patient received appropriate rate response while riding upright on the stationary bike, but not when leaning forward while exercising.A request was made to have data from this device analyzed due to the numerous attempts at reprogramming to address the patient's needs.Data analysis indicated that the mv sensor had been disabled 0.04% of the device's implanted time due to noise and rythmiq episodes suggested there was av block at higher rates.Ts recommended further evaluation and reprogramming, accounting for these additional factors pertaining to patient's underlying conditions.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information received reported that the patient implanted with this pacemaker system was seen for an office visit to undergo retrograde/antegrade conduction testing.The pr interval at rest was 171 ms.Retrograde test results were: 190 ms at 90 beats per minute (bpm), 200 ms at 100 bpm, and 210 ms at 110 bpm; setting the pvarp at 240 ms should cover any retrograde conduction.Antegrade testing revealed blocking at 115 bpm.Rythmiq was turned off, and avsearch was set to 300 ms.Technical services (ts) discussed an increase in rv pacing due to the known heart block at 115 bpm.It was noted that the patient was in atrial fibrillation (af) and sudden brady response (sbr) appear to have been stored appropriately.This pacemaker system remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The local area field representative was contacted for additional information.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACCOLADE MRI EL DR
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key18918842
MDR Text Key337853994
Report Number2124215-2024-15963
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWP
UDI-Device Identifier00802526559266
UDI-Public00802526559266
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150012/S000
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Modification/Adjustment
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/16/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberL331
Device Catalogue NumberL331
Device Lot Number543351
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/14/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/30/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age83 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-