WICKIMED PLUMEPEN ELITE SURGICAL SMOKE EVAC PENCIL, 10FT TUBING,QTY20; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number PLP2020 |
Device Problem
Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 02/26/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported device is being returned to conmed for evaluation.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the device evaluation and complaint investigation.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.H3 other text : device not yet received.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer reported that the device, plp2020, plumepen elite surgical smoke evac pencil, 10ft tubing,qty20, was being used on (b)(6) 2024 and ¿one of the clear plastic plume tubes fell off the device while the scrub nurse was preparing it prior to surgery.The team opened another one which she checked and it appeared to be¿.Per further assessment it was found that "the team opened another one which she checked and it appeared to be fine.During surgery the surgeon alerted the scrub nurse that the diathermy had fallen apart, the clear plastic tube had come away from the main body and one of the collars was missing.The broken device was replaced to complete the surgery.It was replaced by the same type of device with the same lot.There were no problems with this device." it was also found that "after several hours of operating the device fell apart in the surgeons hands." it is unknown if the fragment fell into the patient "the surgical wound was searched thoroughly, the swabs, drapes and floor were all searched but the piece of plastic was not found.The piece in question was clear in colour and approximately 2mm in size.The wound was a large midline laparotomy wound.Every effort was made to find the missing piece.It was not radio-opaque and too small to show on an x-ray.It is unknown if the piece fell into the surgical wound or not.User was not injured.Any possible post-operative complaints/complications from the patient are still to be assessed/determined." there was no prolonged hospitalization due to this event and there was a 30 minute delay to the procedure.This report is being raised on the reported injury due to possibility of a foreign body remaining inside of the patient.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer reported that the device, plp2020, plumepen elite surgical smoke evac pencil, 10ft tubing, qty (b)(4), was being used on (b)(6) 2024 and ¿one of the clear plastic plume tubes fell off the device while the scrub nurse was preparing it prior to surgery.The team opened another one which she checked and it appeared to be¿.Per further assessment it was found that "the team opened another one which she checked and it appeared to be fine.During surgery the surgeon alerted the scrub nurse that the diathermy had fallen apart, the clear plastic tube had come away from the main body and one of the collars was missing.The broken device was replaced to complete the surgery.It was replaced by the same type of device with the same lot.There were no problems with this device." it was also found that "after several hours of operating the device fell apart in the surgeons hands." it is unknown if the fragment fell into the patient "the surgical wound was searched thoroughly, the swabs, drapes and floor were all searched but the piece of plastic was not found.The piece in question was clear in colour and approximately 2mm in size.The wound was a large midline laparotomy wound.Every effort was made to find the missing piece.It was not radio-opaque and too small to show on an x-ray.It is unknown if the piece fell into the surgical wound or not.User was not injured.Any possible post-operative complaints/complications from the patient are still to be assessed/determined." there was no prolonged hospitalization due to this event and there was a 30 minute delay to the procedure.This report is being raised on the reported injury due to possibility of a foreign body remaining inside of the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device is not being returned and the photographic evidence provided does not appear to verify the complaint; therefore, a device malfunction cannot be verified.A two-year lot history review shows a total of 15 devices for this lot number and failure mode.A device history record (dhr) review was requested from the manufacturer, and no indication of abnormalities was communicated.(b)(4).We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|