• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O. MAXI TWIN; LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O. MAXI TWIN; LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED Back to Search Results
Model Number KTBB4BSX2AU
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problem Bone Fracture(s) (1870)
Event Date 02/22/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that patient was transfer from a bed to a shower commode by assistance of two caregivers.The carers began moving towards the chair to the right of the bed.During the transfer the hoist began to ¿shake¿ and the patient fell through the middle section of the sling.As a consequence of the event the patient sustained a fractured clavicle and humerus, the device evlauation did not revealed any device or sling malfunction.No signs of problem was found on the hoist that might contribute to device shaking.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information will be provided upon investgation conclusion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a patient was transferred from a bed to a shower by using a maxi twin passive floor lift and bath sling with serial number (b)(6).The caregivers reported that in the middle of a transfer the lift started to ¿shake¿ and the patient fell out from the device through the middle section of the sling.As a consequence of the event, the patient sustained fracture of the collarbone and humerus bone.During the device inspection, there was no device malfunction which might lead to the reported device "shaking".Therefore, the customer allegation was not confirmed.Based on information provided despite the recommendation for the patient to use a size l sling, the caregivers chose a size xl during the event.Moreover, during the interview at the facility, the clinical nurse stated that the patient was prone to movement during the transfer due to her cognitive state.The described situation might be a factor of the device shaking that was noticed.According to the procedures provided in the instructions for the use of the maxi twin: ¿crossed leg attachment - if the resident is prone to kicking, the crossed leg attachment the clips/loops must be applied.This prohibits the leg clips/loops from detachment due to kicking and prevents the resident from possible injury." during the interview with the customer, it was confirmed how the sling was applied during the transfer.The customer stated that the sling leg clips were not crossed.To sum up, the patient's sudden movement might lead to device movement and as a consequence patient fall.To sum up, the arjo lift and arjo passive sling were used as a system for a patient transfer when the patient fell out of the device and sustained a serious injury, and from that perspective, the system failed.The complaint was decided to be reportable due to allegation that the sling clip detached during transfer.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAXI TWIN
Type of Device
LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
ul. ks. piotra wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki PL-62 052
PL  PL-62052
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
ul. ks. piotra wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki PL-62 052
PL   PL-62052
Manufacturer Contact
justyna kielbowska
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki 62-05-2
PL   62-052
883337089
MDR Report Key18921469
MDR Text Key337869874
Report Number3007420694-2024-00077
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FSA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/18/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Device Model NumberKTBB4BSX2AU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/22/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/14/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age89 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight74 KG
-
-