This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The device associated with this report was returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.Upon visual inspection revealed that cordcutter *ea shows wear mark, these wear marks as usual on these types of reusable devices.The inner shaft was not returned.The etch marks are slightly faded.A functional test was unable to be performed based on the condition of the device.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the cordcutter *ea would have contributed to the complained issue.Based on the investigation findings, a potential cause could be traced to continuous use since this device is reusable, the continuous use and sterilization process can cause worn condition and the fading of the etch marks.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As per ifu inspect for damage prior to use.Replace a damaged, worn or bent instrument, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|
It was reported by a sales rep in (b)(6) that during service and repair, it was determined that the cordcutter device was damaged.During in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that the device etching was slightly illegible, there was a wear mark and the components were damaged.There was no procedure involved.No additional information was provided.
|