• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US CORDCUTTER *EA; CUTTER, SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US CORDCUTTER *EA; CUTTER, SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 214646
Device Problems Use of Device Problem (1670); Component Missing (2306)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/07/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The device associated with this report was returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.Upon visual inspection revealed that cordcutter *ea shows wear mark, these wear marks as usual on these types of reusable devices.The inner shaft was not returned.The etch marks are slightly faded.A functional test was unable to be performed based on the condition of the device.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the cordcutter *ea would have contributed to the complained issue.Based on the investigation findings, a potential cause could be traced to continuous use since this device is reusable, the continuous use and sterilization process can cause worn condition and the fading of the etch marks.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As per ifu inspect for damage prior to use.Replace a damaged, worn or bent instrument, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
 
Event Description
It was reported by a sales rep in (b)(6) that during service and repair, it was determined that the cordcutter device was damaged.During in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that the device etching was slightly illegible, there was a wear mark and the components were damaged.There was no procedure involved.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
CUTTER, SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key18923185
MDR Text Key337892809
Report Number1221934-2024-00919
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FZT
UDI-Device Identifier10886705004270
UDI-Public10886705004270
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/18/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number214646
Device Lot Number20B01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/07/2024
Date Manufacturer Received03/11/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/06/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-