Catalog Number 07.702.040S |
Device Problem
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/01/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: d9: complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.H3, h4, h6: without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in japan as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2024, the patient underwent an unknown surgery with tfna implants and cement for a right femoral trochanteric fracture.Fixation was done, and upon final review with an image intensifier prior to closure, it appeared that cement was leaking from the fracture around the antero-medial side.During the cementing process, checks with an image intensifier were performed in 2 directions, but no cement leakage was observed at that time.After checking by palpation, the surgeon determined that there was no problem, and the surgery was completed successfully with no surgical delay.During the blade measurement phase, there was some confusion in selecting the blade length from the standpoint of intraoperative compression, etc.As a result, the blade was inserted short, which resulted in a closer distance between the cement and the fracture site.The patient status and outcome was reported as stable.No further information is available.This report is for one (1) traumacem v+ bone cement injectable this is report 1 of 1 for complaint (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|