• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ACUMED, LLC 2.0MM QUICK RELEASE DRILL; BIT, DRILL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ACUMED, LLC 2.0MM QUICK RELEASE DRILL; BIT, DRILL Back to Search Results
Model Number 80-0318
Device Problems Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/16/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is currently pending.A follow-up report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
3 of 3.It was reported during a wrist fracture surgery, the surgeon put a 2.0mm drill guide to the plate through the targeting guide.The first drill guide threads broke when the surgeon tightened it.The next drill guide got stuck.The surgeon opened another acu-loc 2 instrument set and new drill guides.The surgery was completed after a 20-minute delay.There were no other adverse patient consequences reported.There are 3 related report numbers for this event 3025141-2024-00267 through 3025141-2024-00269.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing and inspection records were reviewed, and no anomalies were found.Two 2.0mm locking drill guide 4mm-32mm and one 2.0mm quick release drill were returned for evaluation.Several unspecified items likely involved with the engagement were not returned; this namely includes the plate (which the drill guides threaded into) and the targeting guide (which the drill guides were inserted through).The returned product was visually examined under magnification.On one of the returned locking drill guides, there was a hole torn within the threading itself; this tear damage spiraled along with the threading.The tear progressed along with the threading for approximately one turn of the threading in the tip region of the guide.This damage was present in the trough/root of the device's thread.The other returned locking drill guide was returned with a drill embedded within this guide.There were occasional instances of pitting or nicks in the peak/crests of the thread form at the tip of this guide.As previously stated, the returned drill was embedded in one of the returned locking drill guides which partially obscured the region of the drill shaft stuck within the guide and may inhibit visual evaluation as well as shaft diameter measurement of the drill.There were occasional instances of pitting or nicks on the edges of the flutes of this drill.Measurements for 80-0318 drill were taken in inches.All measurements and average were within the tolerance range.Given that up to ~2.3 inches of the shaft of the drill was embedded in one of the guides (as the drill was returned stuck in the guide), the measurements were taken from the ~1.84 inches of exposed smooth shaft.A functionality test specifically for guide-on-plate engagement of the guide that failed the reported engagement in the field was not conducted.The guide that had difficulty with the reported guide-on-plate engagement was damaged as previously stated to a point where it would not be feasible to attempt further similar engagements.Conducting usage testing would risk damaging the returned locking drill guide further.A functionality test specifically for drill-on-guide engagement failure could not be conducted as the drill and one guide were returned wholly stuck together.It was not possible to remove the drill from the guide to test the engagement.It was not possible to comprehensively investigate this incident without all relevant items present.This situation fundamentally involves part failures from a thread-on-thread engagement (i.E., threading the guide into the plate) in which the field only returned half of the relevant parts in that engagement (i.E., just the guides, not the plate).The field incident of drill-in-guide engagement failure was confirmed; however, the exact cause is unknown.The drill and guide cannot be separated for further evaluation.However, based on the information received and due to unknown surgical conditions, the root cause could not be determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
2.0MM QUICK RELEASE DRILL
Type of Device
BIT, DRILL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ACUMED, LLC
5885 ne cornelius pass road
hillsboro OR 97124
Manufacturer (Section G)
ACUMED LLC
5885 ne cornelius pass road
hillsboro OR 97124
Manufacturer Contact
ellie wood
5885 ne cornelius pass road
hillsboro, OR 97124
MDR Report Key18937687
MDR Text Key338189730
Report Number3025141-2024-00269
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/19/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number80-0318
Device Catalogue Number80-0318
Device Lot Number403169
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/18/2024
Date Manufacturer Received03/27/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/27/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-