The medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Device pending return.
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: a catheter was returned for evaluation and hence, a physical investigation was performed for the catheter.During physical investigation, the helix was broken at 37 cm distance from the tip of the catheter.The broken part of the helix was delivered outside of the catheter.It was not possible to specify the root cause further using the information provided by the user.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported helix break issue.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiry date: 07/2026), g3.H11: b5, d3, g1, h6 (method, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|