• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 62 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 62 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RED62SKIT
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/23/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 62 reperfusion catheter (red62), a non-penumbra sheath, and a guidewire.During the procedure, the physician completed one pass using the red62.While aspirating using the red62 during the second pass, the physician noticed under fluoroscopy that the red62 was fractured.Therefore, the red62 was removed.The procedure was completed using a new red62 and the same sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following sections are being updated based on additional information provided by a penumbra sales representative on 04/11/2024: section a.Box 1.Patient identifier.Section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem.Evaluation of the returned red62 confirmed a fracture on the distal shaft.Further evaluation revealed a kink distal to the fracture and stretching proximal to the fracture.If the device is advanced against resistance, damage such as a kink may occur.Subsequently, if the device is retracted against resistance, damage such as stretching, and a fracture may occur.The root cause of resistance during the procedure could not be determined.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 62 reperfusion catheter (red62), a non-penumbra sheath, and a guidewire.During the procedure, the physician completed one pass using the red62.While aspirating using the red62 during the second pass, the physician noticed under fluoroscopy that the distal length of the red62 was fractured.Therefore, the red62 was removed.The procedure was completed using a new red62 and the same sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 62 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key18947734
MDR Text Key338560039
Report Number3005168196-2024-00095
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948023444
UDI-Public815948023444
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodePL
PMA/PMN Number
K203440
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,04/19/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/21/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRED62SKIT
Device Lot NumberF00007702
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/15/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received03/20/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/27/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-