ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. ENSEAL G2 ART STRA SEALER 45CM; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number NSLG2S45A |
Device Problems
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/29/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, during robot assisted procedure, the jaws were broken.The broken piece was removed from body.The device was used as usual.No pieces were left inside the patient.Gen11 was used.Another device was used to complete the case.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No further information is available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 3/21/2024.D4 batch #: unknown.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: did the electrode ceramic separate or break off? no.Did the i blade get damaged or break off? yes.Is the jaw damaged but not broken off? no.Is the top jaw loose but not detached? no.Is the top jaw ptc material damaged? no.Is the black ptc in the upper jaw detached? no.Is the top jaw broken off the of the device? yes.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.The lot/batch was not provided; therefore, the manufacturing records evaluation could not be performed.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 4/5/2024.D4 batch #: a9ch85.Investigation summary: the product was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the device was received with the top of the i-blade fractured and slightly lifted, the jaw was received detached returned.In addition some scratches were noted at the electrode and ptc the device was connected to the generator and it was recognized.Because the i blade was damaged not all functional testing could be performed with the generator.The condition of the blade prevented the functionality of the jaw.The jaw was unable to cycle open and close.A probable cause of the damage to the i blade could be not allowing thick and fibrous tissues to denature prior to i-blade advancement.As described in the ifu: do not use excessive force on the closing handle to close the jaws; grasp only as much tissue as will fit between the jaws where the current will pass.Greater amounts of tissue require more closing handle force.Excessive force could damage the device.It is possible that the scratches at the electrode and the ptc were caused by improper use of the instrument.As part of the quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch a9ch85, and no non-conformances were identified.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|