• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL
Device Problem Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Arrhythmia (1721); Transient Ischemic Attack (2109); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
Event Date 11/01/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: wang z, li j, chen j, guo h, he h, jiao s, chen y, dong j, sun y.Relationship between epicardial adipose tissue volume and recurrence after ablation in premature ventricular complexes.Circ j.2023 nov 1.Doi: 10.1253/circj.Cj-23-0474.Epub ahead of print.Pmid: 37914274.No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the lot number was provided by the customer.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: wang z, li j, chen j, guo h, he h, jiao s, chen y, dong j, sun y.Relationship between epicardial adipose tissue volume and recurrence after ablation in premature ventricular complexes.Circ j.2023 nov 1.Doi: 10.1253/circj.Cj-23-0474.Epub ahead of print.Pmid: 37914274.Objective/methods/study data: background: epicardial adipose tissue (eat) is recognized as a clinical diagnostic marker for cardiometabolic disease.Thicker eat may be associated with recurrence of ventricular tachycardia after ablation.The association between eat volume and recurrence of premature ventricular complexes (pvc) following ablation has not been clarified.Authors investigated the association between eat volume and pvc recurrence following radiofrequency catheter ablation.Methods and results: this retrospective study included 401 patients with pvc undergoing catheter ablation with preprocedural non-contrast computed tomography between 2017 and 2022.The impact of eat volume in predicting pvc recurrence after ablation was analyzed.The mean (±sd) age of patients was 50.2±13.3 years.Multivariable cox analysis revealed that a large eat volume was an independent predictor of pvc recurrence after ablation during a median follow-up of 16.3 months.Kaplan-meier analysis showed a difference in postablation pvc recurrence between the 2 groups dichotomized around the eat volume cut-off.The risk of recurrence increased with increasing eat volume according to restricted cubic spline regression.Furthermore, pvc originating from epicardial locations had larger eat volumes than those originating from the right ventricular outflow tract.Conclusions: a large eat volume was independently associated with pvc recurrence following ablation.Patients with pvc originating from epicardial sites had large eat volumes.Eat volume may help stratify patients according to their risk of pvc recurrence after ablation.Lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected biosense device possibly associated with reported adverse events: thermocool smarttouch ablation catheter concomitant biosense webster devices that were used in this study: n/a concomitant non-biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: n/a adverse event(s) and provided interventions possibly associated with unidentified thermocool smarttouch ablation catheter: qty 1 atrioventricular block (heart block)(recognized procedural complication) qty 1 (pulmonary embolism)(recognized procedural complication) qty 2 (transient ischemic attack)(recognized procedural complication) qty 4 (pericardial effusion)(recognized procedural complication).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL
Type of Device
CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
31 technology drive, suite 200
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
3035526892
MDR Report Key18951499
MDR Text Key338261689
Report Number2029046-2024-00967
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P030031/S053
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/21/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/21/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/25/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
-
-