An event of pericardial effusion was reported.A returned device assessment could not be performed as the device remains implanted and was not returned for analysis.Information from the field indicated that pericardial effusion was noted after the procedure and it got worse after the second day.Then, two weeks follow up, pericardial effusion had decreased.Last follow up, the patient had no symptom and images showed minimal pericardial effusion called physiological effusion which is acceptable based on physician's comments.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported pericardial effusion could not be conclusively determined.There is no indication of a product quality issue with regards to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|