• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORGANON & CO. JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORGANON & CO. JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Jada system 'did not work' [device ineffective].Jada system did not work/failure to obtain a proper suction and seal/ it was more about product troubleshooting and education needs [wrong technique in device usage process].The suspicion was provider placement error and failure to obtain a proper suction and seal [device placement issue].The suspicion was provider placement error and failure to obtain a proper suction and seal [device malfunction].No additional ae, no pqc reported [no adverse event].Case narrative: this spontaneous report originating from united states was received from a other health professional (nurse) via clinical sales educator (cas) referring to multiple female patients of unknown age.The patient's concurrent conditions, concomitant medications, past drugs/allergies and medical history were not reported.This report concerns multiple patients with multiple devices.On unknown date, the patients were placed with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) (lot # and expiration date were not reported) via vaginal route for postpartum hemorrhage.On an unknown date, a healthcare organization had a committee meeting to review severe postpartum hemorrhage cases which included seven hospitals.During the meeting it was reported a vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) did not work (device ineffective).The clinical sales educator (cse) stated the suspicion was provider placement error (device placement issue) and failure to obtain a proper suction and seal (device malfunction).They did not believe it was a result of product failure.It was more about product troubleshooting and education needs (wrong technique in device usage process).The clinical sales educator (cse) did not have the provider's information or the location where this incident occurred, as the reporter did not want to disclose this information.No additional adverse event (ae) (no adverse event), no product quality complaint (pqc) reported.Upon internal review, event device ineffective was determined to be medically significant.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information we have received, there is no indication that the device malfunctioned.The device is assembled according to specifications.In process and finished product testing are performed and approved prior to release.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JADA SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORGANON & CO.
30 hudson street
jersey city NJ 07302
Manufacturer (Section G)
ORGANON & CO.
30 hudson street
jersey city NJ 07302
Manufacturer Contact
30 hudson street
jersey city, NJ 07302
MDR Report Key18958523
MDR Text Key338346494
Report Number3002806821-2024-00024
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
510K K201199
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/22/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/22/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient SexFemale
-
-