The following information is alleged: the patient received a gunther tulip inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on (b)(6) 2010.Approximately 11 years and 3 months after receiving the filter implant, the patient underwent a computed tomography (ct) scan and the imaging from this scan showed that the legs of the patient's filter had penetrated the ivc.The scan also showed that the filter legs had "gone into" the patient's pancreas, duodenum, and were also near the renal vein.The patient expired about a month after the aforementioned ct scan.The death certificate lists intracerebral hemorrhage, chronic anticoagulation, and deep venous thrombosis (dvt) as the causes of death.Wrongful death is alleged by the patient's estate.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
|
Section e3: non-healthcare professional.Investigation.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: death, organ/vena cava perforation, and deep vein thrombosis (dvt).Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma.Ivc occlusion/ thrombosis, new dvt, ivc stenosis as a reported complication, is a known risk in relation to filter implant and is well documented in the clinical literature and in clinical practice guidelines.This is supported by the clinical evidence report established to assess available clinical data to identify and evaluate the clinical safety and performance of the cook vena cava filters.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: vena cava occlusion or thrombosis, vena cava stenosis, deep vein thrombosis.Unknown if the reported death is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.Catalog number and lot number are unknown, however, the alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|