• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ5 INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ5 INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33680005
Device Problem Loss of Osseointegration (2408)
Patient Problems Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Implant Pain (4561)
Event Date 12/21/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could be confirmed based on available medical record and medical expert assessment.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed ¿there is clear radiolucence visible in the provided x-ray from 12-23.Therefore loosening of the tibial component is highly likely, however, there is no clear evidence of migration.The preoperative mri scan shows bone bruise and alteration of the bone stock specifically in the area of the former talar fracture following the work accident in 2017.There was at least some bone damage/ e.G.Inflammation visible which may have contributed to a small extent to the loosening of the implant- it could be said here, that, despite these changes, the event is thus falling into the responsibility of the treating surgeon (in addition to the bone condition that favored implant failure(patient related)).Overall, however, the post-traumatic bone and joint damage that can be demonstrated throughout will have led to persistent pain, which had to be remedied by a surgical measure (joint replacement in this case).¿ based on the investigation, the root cause was attributed to the patient related issue.The failure was detected due to some radiolucency around the tibial component and poor bone quality and hence the loosening of the tibial component can be confirmed, but there is no clear evidence of migration.Overall, the post-traumatic bone and joint damage would have led to persistent pain which can be remedied by a joint replacement.If device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient presented for a 1 year follow up.Upon review of the case the physician noticed that the posterior peg of the talar component is broken and is not fully seated upon implantation.The patient underwent a revision procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ5 INFINITY ADAPTIS
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key18967289
MDR Text Key338435888
Report Number3010667733-2024-00169
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00889797069670
UDI-Public00889797069670
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/25/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/25/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number33680005
Device Lot Number1741975
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/27/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
Patient Weight118 KG
-
-