• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CAROTID WALLSTENT; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CAROTID WALLSTENT; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Model Number 26605
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Premature Activation (1484); Positioning Problem (3009)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/20/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
E1 - initial reporter address 1: (b)(6).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the stent was difficult to position, difficult to reconstrain, and partially deployed.The 90% stenosed, and 4.9mmx15mm target lesion with soft plaque and calcification was located in the tortuous left internal carotid artery.A 18.0-21 carotid wallstent was advanced along the guide catheter to reach the lesion for treatment.When two-thirds of the stent was deployed, it migrated down lower than the lesion.During withdrawal, part of the stent could not be completely recaptured and was exposed when retracting into the sheath.The device was removed, and the procedure was completed with another of same device.There were no complications reported and the patient status was stable.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the stent was difficult to position, difficult to reconstrain, and partially deployed.The 90% stenosed, and 4.9mmx15mm target lesion with soft plaque and calcification was located in the tortuous left internal carotid artery.A 18.0-21 carotid wallstent was advanced along the guide catheter to reach the lesion for treatment.When two-thirds of the stent was deployed, it migrated down lower than the lesion.During withdrawal, part of the stent could not be completely recaptured and was exposed when retracting into the sheath.The device was removed, and the procedure was completed with another of same device.There were no complications reported and the patient status was stable.It was further reported that the stent was dislodged inside patient's body.The stent was intact on the delivery system and was removed with the guiding catheter.The stent may have remained in the guiding catheter and was discarded by the hospital.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
E1 - initial reporter address 1: (b)(6).Device evaluated by mfr.: the carotid was returned for analysis.A visual and tactile examination identified no issues with the shaft of the device.The device was returned with the stent already deployed from the delivery system.The deployed stent was not returned with the device.H6 - device codes: added premature activation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAROTID WALLSTENT
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
rachel shields
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6512422111
MDR Report Key18969549
MDR Text Key338674382
Report Number2124215-2024-17150
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/03/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/25/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number26605
Device Catalogue Number26605
Device Lot Number0030057438
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/25/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/10/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/31/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age60 YR
-
-