Catalog Number 1013785 |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/20/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat the superficial femoral artery (sfa) with heavy calcification.Prior to reaching the lesion in the subintimal artery the nitinol portion of the gw separated.An additional ht command guidewire was returned for device analysis.Return device analysis found the polymer coating, core and coils were separated approximately 12.6 centimeters (cm) distal to the proximal end of the polymer coating.The separated distal portion of the polymer coating, core and coils, including the tip ball, were returned with bent core.The polymer coating material at the separation was stretched, torn, twisted and uneven.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.B3: the first ht command referenced in b5 is filed under a separate medwatch report number.
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequent to initial reports being filed it was reported that the procedure was to treat the superficial femoral artery (sfa) with heavy calcification.Prior to reaching the lesion in the subintimal artery the nitinol portion of the gw separated.An additional ht command guidewire was returned for device analysis.Return device analysis found the polymer coating, core and coils were separated approximately 12.6 centimeters (cm) distal to the proximal end of the polymer coating.The separated distal portion of the polymer coating, core and coils, including the tip ball, were returned with bent core.The polymer coating material at the separation was stretched, torn, twisted and uneven.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The electronic lot history record / device history record and exception review were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed no indication of a lot specific issue.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the noted issue.Analysis of the returned device noted a material separation.At the separation the core was bent and the polymer coating was torn, this suggests the tip separated due to force applied.It is possible that the guide wire was manipulated against resistance, resulting in the separation; however, this cannot be confirmed.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|