|
Catalog Number RBYPODJ45 |
Device Problem
Premature Separation (4045)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/08/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the subclavian artery using a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern) and packing coils (pcs).During the procedure, the physician successfully implanted non-penumbra coils into the target vessel using the lantern.While attempting to advance a pc into the target vessel, the physician determined that the pc did not fit in the vessel.After several strokes of retracting the pc, the coil unintentionally detached within the lantern.Therefore, the lantern containing the pc was removed.The procedure was completed using a new lantern and another pc.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.H3 other text : placeholder.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the subclavian artery using a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern) and packing coils (pc).It should be noted that the patient¿s anatomy was mildly tortuous.During the procedure, the physician successfully implanted non-penumbra coils into the target vessel using the lantern.While attempting to advance a pc into the target vessel, the physician determined that the pc did not fit in the vessel.After several strokes of retracting the pc, the physician noticed via contrast imaging that the coil unintentionally detached within the lantern.Therefore, the lantern containing the pc was removed.The procedure was completed using a new lantern and another pc.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Please note that the following section is being updated based on additional information provided by the distributor on 04/01/2024: 1.Section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem.Evaluation of the returned pod pc confirmed that the embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly.Evaluation revealed that the pusher assembly was fractured on the proximal end, and the pull wire was retracted out of the pusher assembly distal tip.This likely contributed to the embolization coil unintentionally detaching during the procedure.If the proximal end of the device is manipulated at angles during advancement against resistance, damage such as a kink and subsequent fracture may occur.The reported tortuous patient¿s anatomy may have contributed to resistance during the procedure.Further evaluation revealed offset coil winds along the embolization coil.This damage may have occurred due to manipulation against resistance or during packaging for return to penumbra.Penumbra devices are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|