• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Energy Output Problem (1431); Use of Device Problem (1670); Charging Problem (2892); Positioning Problem (3009)
Patient Problems Muscle Weakness (1967); Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); Impaired Healing (2378); Ambulation Difficulties (2544); Cognitive Changes (2551); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 02/13/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id 977c165, serial#(b)(6), implanted: (b)(6) 2024, product type lead section d information references the main component of the system.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 977c165, serial/lot #: (b)(6), ubd: 14-aug-2027, udi#: (b)(4).Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient (pt) regarding an implantable neurostimulator (ins).The reason for call was patient reported that the recovery was a little worse than they thought it would be.Pt mentioned their ins battery had to be charged more frequently than they thought and tries not to let ins get below 50%, and had to use belt because it's uncomfortable to hold paddle in place.Pt mentioned they thought they could still sense the impact of therapy for a little while after turning off.Patient reported that they were having a hard time getting out of bed and that they pulled something in their back.Patient stated that they dealt with 3-4 different reps and that the reps were very helpful; pt did not mentioned reporting charging frequency to reps, agent understood pt meant they had multiple reps involved in trial (mentioned speaking to a rep daily during trial) and programming of ins.Patient me ntioned that they had sciatica and that their hcp had a hard time getting one of the leads placed correctly to optimally help the right side sciatica.Patient noted that they still had some pain, but that it was way better than it was before they got the implant, and they were still seeing how their healing process would go.Patient asked, agent reviewed mri, x-ray, and other compatibility information with the patient and redirected to healthcare provider with further questions related to healing.  patient said their back is so bad that they feel like a fragile little child and cannot lift things like packs of water yet.Patient mentioned having the implant hasn't been good for their mental health, because they can't do certain things and worry aboutbeing 'fragile'.Pt mentioned the winter weather might be making their body feel worse.Patient commented that they spoke to the healthcare provider and the representative shortly after the surgery and they were told that they might get a scar, but they didn't care, and they were very pleased with the therapy and the pain relief they were getting insofar.Agent understood discomfort was due to the healing of implant site.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key18993032
MDR Text Key339144527
Report Number3004209178-2024-07993
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00763000315467
UDI-Public00763000315467
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/28/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/28/2024
Date Device Manufactured01/23/2024
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
"SEE H11...."
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-