• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. ETHILON NYLON SUTURE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. ETHILON NYLON SUTURE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Erythema (1840); Post Operative Wound Infection (2446); Blister (4537); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 02/02/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Does the surgeon believe that any of the ethicon products involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? which specific ethicon products have been used during the procedures (product code, lot number)? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with any of the ethicon products used in this procedure? if so, please provide details.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Patient demographics? this report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.H6 component code: g07002 ¿ device not returned.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Related events captured via 2210968-2024-03576 and 2210968-2024-03577.Citation: journal of wound care vol 32, no 2, february 2023/ https://doi.Org/10.1136/bmj.C1199.
 
Event Description
Title: staples versus sutures wound closure in hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.The objective of this study is to compare two methods of wound skin closure¿staples versus vertical mattress nylon sutures¿in patients undergoing primary total hip (thr) and total knee replacements (tkr).Between september 2018 to september 2019, a total of 100 patients met the inclusion criteria.In the staples group (n=50), 26 patients underwent thr while 24 patients underwent tkr.In the sutures group (n=50), 23 patients underwent thr and 27 patients underwent tkr.The sex distribution of all patients was 80% (n=80) females and 20% (n=20) males.Regarding wound complications, no major wound complication was reported up to six-weeks postoperatively.In total, nine patients in the sutures group (three thr and six tkr) and six patients in the staples group (two thr and four tkr) had minor wound complications such as skin redness, warmth, small blisters and superficial wound infections due to retained stitch or staple.The methods of wound closure were either interrupted vertical mattress nylon sutures (3-0 ethilon nylon suture, us) or staples (covidien appose ulc autosuture slim body skin stapler 35 w, us).The medial parapatellar approach for tkr and the direct transgluteal approach for thr were used.The subcutaneous layer was closed by vicryl 0 suture for all patients.Reported complications included minor wound complications such as skin redness, warmth, small blisters and superficial wound infections (n=9).In conclusion, in thr and tkr, there was no significant difference between either vertical mattress nylon sutures or staples primary skin closure in terms of wound complications and patient satisfaction in this study.The decision on wound closure method should be based on the availability of resources in the institution/country.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ETHILON NYLON SUTURE UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
9083863534
MDR Report Key18998978
MDR Text Key338881351
Report Number2210968-2024-03577
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GAR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJO
PMA/PMN Number
K946173
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/28/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-