• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.(CRM-SYLMAR) AVEIR¿ LEADLESS PACEMAKER, RIGHT VENTRICLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.(CRM-SYLMAR) AVEIR¿ LEADLESS PACEMAKER, RIGHT VENTRICLE Back to Search Results
Model Number LSP112V
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems Stroke/CVA (1770); Unspecified Infection (1930); Cardiac Tamponade (2226); Pericardial Effusion (3271); Embolism/Embolus (4438); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
Related manufacturer reference number: (b)(4).It was reported aveir leadless pacemakers (lp) were used as part of a study involving aveir and micra leadless pacemakers.This event it to report the observations on the aveir lps used in the study.The study reviewed twenty-five consecutive patients who received aveir lps between may and november 2022 from implant to ten weeks post-implant.During one implant attempt, the aveir lp had difficulty releasing from the delivery catheter which resulted in dislodgement and increased capture thresholds.The aveir lp was successfully retrieved and repositioned.The study discussed the safety of aveir lps, referencing the aveir vr trials.The reference cited pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade were the commonest complications with an incidence between 0.3% and 1%.Some of these patients needed sternotomy and 1 patient died in these trials.Vascular access complications, pericarditis, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and contrast nephropathy have been reported with incidence <0.3% and device dislodgement with reimplantation happened in 1.5% of implants in these trials.The study stated, of these complications, only the one case of dislodgement occurred within the twenty-five implants of the study but was hesitant to draw any inferences on safety due to the difference in sample size and short term follow-up limits.The study concluded that aveir lps were similar in effectiveness and safety compared to micra.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Section e: wiley title: a comparative study of the two leadless pacemakers in clinical practice.(j cardiovasc electrophysiol.2023;34:1896-1903.Doi:10.1111/jce.16019 ) authors: ghanshyam shantha md, mph; jonathan brock md; matthew j.Singleton md, mbe, mhs, msc; alexander joseph schmitt md; patrick kozak md; george bodziock md; natalie bradford md; patrick whalen md; prashant bhave md.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AVEIR¿ LEADLESS PACEMAKER, RIGHT VENTRICLE
Type of Device
Leadless pacemaker
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.(CRM-SYLMAR)
15900 valley view court
sylmar CA 91342
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.(CRM-SYLMAR)
15900 valley view court
sylmar CA 91342
Manufacturer Contact
richard williamson
15900 valley view court
sylmar, CA 91342
MDR Report Key19001310
MDR Text Key338874435
Report Number2017865-2024-37174
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PNJ
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150035
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Study,Literature,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/28/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberLSP112V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
-
-