During a colonoscopy, the physician used multiple cook acusnare polypectomy snare.It was reported [that] the snare would not cut the polyp even with the cauterization on.The device allowed coagulation/burning but did not cut properly.Settings were set at dual 20 for cut, 20 for coagulation.Procedure was completed by the user pulling out the device along with the polyp.No harm to patient.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
Section g pma/510(k): k173673.Investigation evaluation: a product evaluation was not performed in response to this report because the product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.The report could not be confirmed.Ten sealed devices from lot w4791338 were returned and evaluated.Sealed devices #1-10: our laboratory evaluation of the sealed devices could not confirm the report as it was described, the devices functioned as intended.The devices were submitted to the engineering test lab (etl) and were functionally tested to verify that a polypectomy could be performed successfully.The etl determined that the devices met the requirements.The snares attached to the active cord, advanced through the scope, advanced out of the device, ensnared and electrosurgically incised tissue, retracted back into the device, and removed from the scope all as expected.Therefore, the complaint could not be confirmed for the sealed devices.A review of the device history record for the used devices could not be conducted because the lot number was not provided.The device history record for the returned sealed devices was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: used devices: we could not conduct a complete investigation because the product said to be involved was not returned for evaluation.A definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined.Sealed devices: a definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined because the products said to be involved functioned as intended.A discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported observation was not observed during our laboratory analysis of the returned product.The instructions for use contain the following information to assist with proper set-up and use of the device: "before using this device, follow recommendations provided by electrosurgical unit manufacturer to ensure patient safety through proper placement and utilization of patient return electrode.Ensure a proper path from patient return electrode to electrosurgical unit is maintained throughout the procedure." prior to distribution, all acusnare polypectomy snares are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|