• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9755RSL23J
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Heart Block (4444)
Event Date 12/08/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported by our edwards lifesciences japanese affiliate, the patient underwent a transfemoral tavr and received a 23 mm sapien 3 ultra resilia valve in the native aortic position.Immediately after procedure, the patient developed first degree atrioventricular block and left bundle branch block.Later, there was no pause, the patient was discharged.On postoperative day (pod) nine (9), level of consciousness (loc) was observed immediately after the patient was discharged.Transient atrioventricular block was confirmed.A permanent pacemaker was implanted.On postoperative day (pod) -20, the patient outcome was reported as resolving.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Per the instructions for use (ifu), conduction system defects (heart block), arrhythmias and conduction system defects that may require a permanent pacemaker are potential adverse events associated with balloon aortic valvuloplasty, bioprosthetic heart valves, and the thv procedure.According to the valve academic research consortium (varc) guidelines, the close anatomical relationship between the aortic valve complex and the branching atrioventricular bundle may explain these complications of the thv procedure.According to the literature review, and as documented in ew clinical technical summary for complaints-conduction disturbances/ heart block, atrioventricular conduction disturbances after thv are associated with many patient-related and procedural related factors, including pre-operative co-morbid status, the degree, and bulkiness of aortic valve and annular calcification, inter-ventricular septal thickness, pre-existing electrocardiogram abnormalities, the depth of prosthesis implantation, and the profile of the implanted prosthesis.Unlike conventional avr, where there may be localized trauma due to decalcification of the annulus and/or suture placement in the proximity of the av node or the bundles, thv may cause conduction abnormalities through mechanical impingement of the conduction system by the prosthesis.The mechanisms of the development of heart block after thv are well documented and described in the literature.It is also documented that pre-existing heart block is common in patients undergoing thv or surgical avr and another 4-6 % will develop postoperative heart block, potentially requiring a permanent pacemaker.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a product malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Investigation results suggest/indicate a definitive root cause could not be determined due to limited information received.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of this adverse event is not required at this time.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.As such, neither a product risk assessment, nor corrective or preventative actions are required at this time at this time.H3 other text : the valve remains implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key19005566
MDR Text Key338927894
Report Number2015691-2024-02452
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103217322
UDI-Public(01)00690103217322(17)260625
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/29/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/29/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9755RSL23J
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/07/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/26/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age84 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-