• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION INC. WEB SL; INTRASACCULAR FLOW DISRUPTION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION INC. WEB SL; INTRASACCULAR FLOW DISRUPTION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number W5-4-2-MVI-2
Device Problem Separation Problem (4043)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/21/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported during a web embolization procedure, the web failed to detach despite using three different wdc controllers.Other failed attempts were made by manipulating the catheter and pusher wire numerous times, re-sheathing the device, and redeploying it.The web device was removed from the patient.Another attempt was made to detach the web outside the patient, and it worked.There was no patient injury or intervention required.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The investigation of the returned web system found the implant separated from the delivery system, the overcoil stretched and damaged at the distal end, the hypotube kinked at the proximal section, the proximal connector kinked at the brown lead wire joint, and the heater coil windings stretched.The heater coil pet was found melted, indicating that the device was activated using a detachment controller during the procedure; therefore, the damage to the heater coil windings likely occurred post-activation.The stretched heater coil windings are an indication that the tether could have been caught in between the coil windings and caused the heater coil to stretch when the delivery system was pulled/retracted during the procedure.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the damage, but the damage is consistent with experiencing forces over specifications.The microcatheter was not returned, so the investigation could not determine if it had caused or contributed to the reported complaint.Potential complications as referenced on the ifu, include but are not limited to the following: hematoma at the site of entry, aneurysm rupture, emboli, vessel perforation, parent artery occlusion, hemorrhage, ischemia, vasospasm, clot formation, device migration or misplacement, premature or difficult device detachment, non-detachment, incomplete aneurysm filling, revascularization, post-embolization syndrome, and neurological deficits including stroke and death.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WEB SL
Type of Device
INTRASACCULAR FLOW DISRUPTION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callhan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key19009390
MDR Text Key339009316
Report Number2032493-2024-00255
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OPR
UDI-Device Identifier00842429103746
UDI-Public(01)00842429103746(11)230508(17)280430(10)0000357964
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P170032
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/31/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/31/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberW5-4-2-MVI-2
Device Lot Number0000357964
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/25/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/19/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/08/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-