Consumer submitted a proposed treatment plan, which did not include any assessment of the cause of the damage by the dentist.Consumer also stated that there was nothing that indicated that there was any defect with the bruxism device.This is an over the counter bruxism device intended for mild to moderate bruxism.Consumer stated that she normally uses a prescription device, which is intended for extreme bruxing, but used this device because she forgot her prescription device.Labeling clearly states that the device should not be used if it dislodges easily.The device was not returned, so a complete evaluation could not be completed.This report is being submitted as a cracked tooth is considered a serious injury.Medical attention was sought.Note: this report is being provided as a part of a retrospective review, per discussion with fda medical device policy branch, and was performed as a result of recent changes/improvements made to our mdr reporting system as a result of an internal audit.This resulted in a two-year retrospective review for reportable events in order to identify and submit all events meeting the criteria described by the fda representative.
|