• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER SPINE-SWITZERLAND UNIVISE SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION PLATE, 40MM; IMPLANT- SPINAL PROCESS FIXATION PLATE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER SPINE-SWITZERLAND UNIVISE SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION PLATE, 40MM; IMPLANT- SPINAL PROCESS FIXATION PLATE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 48590040
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Insert (1316)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/17/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that initially the univise implant wouldn't compress due to the different thickness of superior and inferior spinous process.Using the compressor and final tightening the device (2 clicks with torque limiting handle) the surgeon was able to achieve a little more compression but was still not confident.Teeth on smaller sp were still not really engaged into the bone.The surgeon loosened, compressed and final tightened again when the implant broke.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Method: device not returned.Results: the univise spinous process fixation plate, 40mm was confirmed to disassemble during surgery by sales rep report and by a picture of the disassembled device provided by the sales rep.However, three requests for return of the device were made and it was not received.Furthermore, no anomalies were identified in the manufacturing files for the reported lot that may have contributed to the event.Additionally it was reported that the superior and inferior spinous processes that the plate was being attached to were of significantly different thickness.The plates were opening and closing properly, however the plates could not fit to the patient anatomy.This led to excessive force being applied to the device and caused disassembly.Conclusion: this issue is related to improper implant selection and patient anatomy.
 
Event Description
It was reported that initially the univise implant wouldn't compress due to the different thickness of superior and inferior spinous process.Using the compressor and final tightening the device (2 clicks with torque limiting handle) the surgeon was able to achieve a little more compression but was still not confident.Teeth on smaller sp were still not really engaged into the bone.The surgeon loosened, compressed and final tightened again when the implant broke.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNIVISE SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION PLATE, 40MM
Type of Device
IMPLANT- SPINAL PROCESS FIXATION PLATE
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER SPINE-SWITZERLAND
le crêt-du-locle 10 a
-
la chaux-de-fonds 2300
CH  2300
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER SPINE-SWITZERLAND
le crêt-du-locle 10 a
-
la chaux-de-fonds 2300
CH   2300
Manufacturer Contact
daniel roberts
2 pearl court
allendale, NJ 07401
2017608000
MDR Report Key3570031
MDR Text Key4056391
Report Number3005525032-2014-00012
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PEK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K132968
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/17/2013
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/13/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number48590040
Device Lot NumberB34438
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/17/2013
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age53 YR
-
-