• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LIMITED INFANT CONTINUOUS FLOW BREATHING CIRCUIT; BTT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LIMITED INFANT CONTINUOUS FLOW BREATHING CIRCUIT; BTT Back to Search Results
Model Number RT330
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Moisture or Humidity Problem (2986)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/02/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A medical centre in (b)(6) reported to a fisher & paykel healthcare (fph) representative that they noticed excessive condensation in the rt330 infant optiflow circuit during use.The medical centre also reported that the inner tubing had separated from the outer tubing near the chamber end.No patient consequence reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Method: the complaint device was not returned to fisher & paykel healthcare in (b)(6.Therefore, our investigation is based on the information provided by the hospital, previous investigations of similar complaints and our knowledge of the product.A lot check could not be peformed as a lot number was not provided.Without the return of the complaint device we are unable to determine what may have caused the problem experienced by the customer.However, it is possible that the observed condensate was influenced by environmental conditions, such as the ambient temperature.Condensate in the humidification system, although not preferred, is an expected side effect of heated pass-over humidification systems in many conditions, and may vary between light misting to water droplets that form on the wall of cool breathing circuit tubing.The amount of condensate in the optiflow system is influenced by a number of multiple set up and environmental factors.If the complaint breathing circuit had been returned to fisher & paykel healthcare, the resistance of the heater wire would have been measured and the breathing circuit would have been connected to an opt312 optiflow junior interface and performance tested.Also, the circuit would have been visually inspected for the reported fault of the inner tubing becoming separated from the outer tubing near the chamber end.The user instructions supplied with the rt330 infant optiflow circuit state the following: - "patient monitoring is recommended." - "do not cover the circuit with material such as blankets, towels or bed linen." - "do not stretch or milk the tubing." device not returned to manufacturer.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFANT CONTINUOUS FLOW BREATHING CIRCUIT
Type of Device
BTT
Manufacturer (Section D)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LIMITED
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
auckland, auckland 2013
NZ  2013
Manufacturer (Section G)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LIMITED
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
auckland, auckland 2013
NZ   2013
Manufacturer Contact
raymond yan
15365 barranca parkway
irvine, CA 92618-2216
MDR Report Key3607191
MDR Text Key4090881
Report Number9611451-2014-00099
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BTT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020332
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/07/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/04/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRT330
Device Catalogue NumberRT330
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/07/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-