Catalog Number 210133 |
Device Problem
Unknown (for use when the device problem is not known) (2204)
|
Patient Problem
Surgical procedure, repeated (2042)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
This complaint file is being used to document the fourth of four revision arthroscopic surgeries performed on the same patient, following a revision surgery documented in medwatch 1221934-2014-00064, although specific dates and locations are unknown.During the sales rep¿s call to us on (b)(4) 2014, he stated that he received a call from an attorney on (b)(6) 2014 inquiring as to how long our rigidfix pins take to be fully absorbed by the body.During the rep¿s call to the physician¿s assistant on or after (b)(6) 2014, the pa informed our rep that four additional surgical procedures had occurred as a result of the patient¿s reported pain.The physician assistant reported these four additional procedures that were performed at various facilities by different surgeons were as a result of additional opinions that the patient sought because of her reported pain, however, the rep was told that no further loose bodies were discovered.See associated medwatch #s 1221934-2014-00064, 1221934-2014-00065, 1221934-2014-00066, and 1221934-2014-00067.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Attempts have been made to retrieve additional information about the event and device.The additional information will reportedly be forwarded to depuy mitek.Depuy mitek would like to file this initial medwatch report at this time.When and if additional information is received it will be reflected in a follow-up medwatch report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The complaint device has not been returned.No further information regarding the patient or the event was available to determine the root cause of the reported failure.A batch record review has been conducted and the results indicate that this batch of product was processed without any incident related to the complaint and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy mitek complaints system revealed one dissimilar complaint with no patient consequences for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.From the complaint history, it seems that this failure is an anomaly and an isolated incident.At this point in time, no further action is warranted.However, should any new information be provided in future, this file will be re-opened and a thorough investigation will be performed.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
Event Description
|
This complaint file is being used to document the fourth of four revision arthroscopic surgeries performed on the same patient, following a revision surgery documented in medwatch 1221934-2014-00064, although specific dates and locations are unknown.During this complaint file is being used to document the fourth of four revision arthroscopic surgeries performed on the same patient, following a revision surgery documented in medwatch 1221934-2014-00064, although specific dates and locations are unknown.During the sales rep¿s call to us on february 4, 2014, he stated that he received a call from an attorney on january 30, 2014 inquiring as to how long our rigidfix pins take to be fully absorbed by the body.During the rep¿s call to the physician¿s assistant on or after january 30, 2014, the pa informed our rep that four additional surgical procedures had occurred as a result of the patient¿s reported pain.The physician assistant reported these four additional procedures that were performed at various facilities by different surgeons were as a result of additional opinions that the patient sought because of her reported pain, however the rep was told that no further loose bodies were discovered.See associated medwatch's 1221934-2014-00064, 1221934-2014-00065, 1221934-2014-00066, and 1221934-2014-00067.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|