• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK MITEK RIGIDFIX PLA 3.3MM FEMORAL CROSS PIN KIT; ACL IMPLANTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK MITEK RIGIDFIX PLA 3.3MM FEMORAL CROSS PIN KIT; ACL IMPLANTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 210133
Device Problem Unknown (for use when the device problem is not known) (2204)
Patient Problem Surgical procedure, repeated (2042)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This complaint file is being used to document the fourth of four revision arthroscopic surgeries performed on the same patient, following a revision surgery documented in medwatch 1221934-2014-00064, although specific dates and locations are unknown.During the sales rep¿s call to us on (b)(4) 2014, he stated that he received a call from an attorney on (b)(6) 2014 inquiring as to how long our rigidfix pins take to be fully absorbed by the body.During the rep¿s call to the physician¿s assistant on or after (b)(6) 2014, the pa informed our rep that four additional surgical procedures had occurred as a result of the patient¿s reported pain.The physician assistant reported these four additional procedures that were performed at various facilities by different surgeons were as a result of additional opinions that the patient sought because of her reported pain, however, the rep was told that no further loose bodies were discovered.See associated medwatch #s 1221934-2014-00064, 1221934-2014-00065, 1221934-2014-00066, and 1221934-2014-00067.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Attempts have been made to retrieve additional information about the event and device.The additional information will reportedly be forwarded to depuy mitek.Depuy mitek would like to file this initial medwatch report at this time.When and if additional information is received it will be reflected in a follow-up medwatch report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint device has not been returned.No further information regarding the patient or the event was available to determine the root cause of the reported failure.A batch record review has been conducted and the results indicate that this batch of product was processed without any incident related to the complaint and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy mitek complaints system revealed one dissimilar complaint with no patient consequences for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.From the complaint history, it seems that this failure is an anomaly and an isolated incident.At this point in time, no further action is warranted.However, should any new information be provided in future, this file will be re-opened and a thorough investigation will be performed.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Event Description
This complaint file is being used to document the fourth of four revision arthroscopic surgeries performed on the same patient, following a revision surgery documented in medwatch 1221934-2014-00064, although specific dates and locations are unknown.During this complaint file is being used to document the fourth of four revision arthroscopic surgeries performed on the same patient, following a revision surgery documented in medwatch 1221934-2014-00064, although specific dates and locations are unknown.During the sales rep¿s call to us on february 4, 2014, he stated that he received a call from an attorney on january 30, 2014 inquiring as to how long our rigidfix pins take to be fully absorbed by the body.During the rep¿s call to the physician¿s assistant on or after january 30, 2014, the pa informed our rep that four additional surgical procedures had occurred as a result of the patient¿s reported pain.The physician assistant reported these four additional procedures that were performed at various facilities by different surgeons were as a result of additional opinions that the patient sought because of her reported pain, however the rep was told that no further loose bodies were discovered.See associated medwatch's 1221934-2014-00064, 1221934-2014-00065, 1221934-2014-00066, and 1221934-2014-00067.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITEK RIGIDFIX PLA 3.3MM FEMORAL CROSS PIN KIT
Type of Device
ACL IMPLANTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
na
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
david primmerman
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham, MA 02767
8003824682
MDR Report Key3629764
MDR Text Key17386929
Report Number1221934-2014-00068
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K974341
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/30/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/14/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2014
Device Catalogue Number210133
Device Lot Number3492971
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer01/30/2014
Date Manufacturer Received01/30/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/17/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-